HHO kit and water injection prohibited at the Auto Technical Control by the DREAL

[sicetaitsimple]

But if you have nothing to produce, you also have the very legitimate right to shut up ......

what delicacy! Since you have nothing to produce, here as elsewhere, you therefore know what you have to do ....!

I await the examples proving your assertions. If you do not have one, I confirm that you have the right to close your mouth on your judgment relating to my interventions on this site.

[plasmanu]

Here is a good one for Janic and Exnihiloest!

The Titanic was built by industrialists, and Noah's ark by an amateur, we know the results!

Do I bring the boxing gloves?

Even better
https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marc ... es-1359349

Screenshot_2020-01-17-20-06-45.jpg (386.25 KB) Viewed 2441 times

[GuyGadebois]

But if you have nothing to produce, you also have the very legitimate right to shut up ......

what delicacy! Since you have nothing to produce, here as elsewhere, you therefore know what you have to do ....!

I await the examples proving your assertions. If you don't have one, I confirm that you have the right to shut your mouth on your judgment relating to my interventions on this site.

I don't want to add fuel to the fire (you know me), but ... the right yes, but in some cases it's a duty ...

[Exnihiloest]

What dates back to 2016?

CO2 emissions / km from new cars ... hey, you have to follow a little ... See my previous message!

Lots of energy mobilized against CO2, but for nothing, see https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12295.

Summary
This article examines the impact of temperature reduction of the main climate policy proposals implemented by 2030, using the MAGICC standard climate model. Even assuming with optimism that the promised emission reductions will be sustained throughout the century, the impacts are generally small.
The impact of the US Clean Power Plan (USCPP) is a reduction in temperature rise of 0,013 ° C by 2100. The pledge made by the United States for the COP21 climate conference in Paris, their contribution known as "Intended Nationally Determined Contribution" (INDC), will reduce the temperature increase by 0,031 ° C.
EU 20-20 policy has an impact of 0,026 ° C, the EU INDC 0,053 ° C and the INDC of China 0,048 ° C. All the climate policies of the United States, China, the EU and the rest of the world, implemented between the early 2000s and 2030 and maintained throughout the century, should help reduce the increase in world temperature around 0,17 ° C in 2100. These impact estimates are robust to the different calibrations of climate sensitivity, to the carbon cycle and to the different climate scenarios.

[sicetaitsimple]

From Guygadebois:

I don't want to add fuel to the fire (you know me), but ... the right yes, but in some cases it's a duty ...

No, I'm correcting it because that wasn't my point, Janic can tell anything he wants in his favorite sandboxes, I can have my opinion but I'm not interested in debating it. On the other hand, if I am told "As you have nothing to produce, here as elsewhere ", or" [i] if I trust your various interventions in other threads where your impressions and certainties date back well over 50 years. "., there I tend to react a little.
[/ I]
"I am waiting for the examples to prove your assertions. If you don't have any, I confirm that you have the right to shut your mouth on your judgment relating to my interventions on this site. "

Now, I await the examples..
If there isn't any, Janic please you talk about "vaccination" and "real AB", there you are a real cador, I promise I will not come or bother you very little.

[Exnihiloest]

Here is a good one for Janic and Exnihiloest!

The Titanic was built by industrialists, and Noah's ark by an amateur, we know the results!

Do I bring the boxing gloves?

Noah's Ark was built on the orders of God, the largest industrialist in the universe, his creation testifies to this!
And his terrible management ("or you obey me, or you end up in hell") allowed him to have zealous workers, not amateurs!

[GuyGadebois]

...... An article by Bjørn Lomborg ...

A repentant ecologist *, who is the initiator of "Copenhagen Consensus", another rotten Think Tank for the most part economists ((Robert Fogel 94 , Finn Kydland 76 , Robert Mundell 87 , Douglas North died at 95, Edward Prescott 79 , Thomas Schelling died at 95, Vernon Smith 93 years old) !!!
Still spoiled old people who understand nothing at all about what is happening today.
Thank you Tryphon, once again.

* Author of a book prefaced by ... Claude Allègre ... (LOOOOOOLLLLL)

[Janic]

No, I'm correcting it because that wasn't my point, Janic can tell anything he wants in his favorite sandboxes, I can have my opinion but I'm not interested in debating it. On the other hand, if I am told "As you have nothing to produce, here as elsewhere", or "if I trust your various interventions in other threads where your impressions and certainties date back well over 50 years. "., there I have a tendency to react.

Reflection that follows this:
Clearly, I try not to tell anything by relying on my impressions or my certainties from 40 or 50 years ago.
you try, but you can't seem to get there if I trust your various interventions in other threads where your impressions and certainties date back well over 50 years

This is called returning the elevator to abstract and therefore unprovable statements, which allows us to do the same.

"I await the examples proving your assertions. If you do not have any, I confirm that you have the right to shut your mouth on your judgment relating to my interventions on this site."

Just as you have the right to do the same on my interventions on this site. I don't usually return the ball if I was sent one, the return to the sender simply.

Now I await the examples.

All full of course!

If there is not, Janic please you speak of "vaccination" and "of true AB", there you are a true cador [*], promised I would not come or very little t 'bother.

Well here it is, that is where we had to start. When you don't know a subject, you avoid value judgments or you show curiosity and seek information first, before challenging.
This subject, on the HOH has been the subject of more or less successful experiments for amateurs, but the critics who dispute these cases there, have never studied, then tried the method. It is therefore valid for any other subject including vaccinations or real organic, or more than organic as Did said. However, Did's bio does not upset the agricultural world since it is aimed at “DIYers” Sunday gardeners, hence its deserved success.

[*] no I am not a cador, because I do not know everything on these subjects, but I know them better than those who know little or nothing and who pretend they are specialists because they have read some media just as ignorant as they on these subjects.

[Christophe]

We can see it here. It feels like on a ski jump ... The trouble is that we left to go well above the goal.



http://www.carbone4.com/decryptage-mobi ... es-neuves/

I guess the numbers are the same for the 2 curves (ademe) so we are talking about the same 2 curves ...

Could this recovery not be explained by the "boom" in electric cars which has weakened since 2016?

[sicetaitsimple]

Could this recovery not be explained by the "boom" in electric cars which has weakened since 2016?

According to the article that accompanies the curve, the rise is due on the one hand to the increase in the weight of vehicles ("SUVisation") and on the other hand to the shift in sales from diesel to gasoline (following in particular to the 2015/2016 "dieselgates").