Improve exchanges and Graham's target

[thibr]

Do not take the image of the video directly in the face or for yourself, especially if Izentrop is directing you here. Note from Remundo.

Some thoughts to improve the quality of exchanges on forums and in real life

Fuck you little shit. This is a very base way of expressing disagreement. But there is worse. And there are especially much better

[Christophe]

The theory is good ... remains to be put into practice ...

I put this topic in my signature! Just to remind everyone, everywhere ...

[Christophe]

Also, in the same family, here is the "conjugal violenceometer".

He is misleading because he is not sexually neutral and implies that it is the men who are the aggressors, but let's move on to the form.

It can very well be applied in virtual exchanges ... at least on certain points ...

[Obamot]

I have updated

[ABC2019]

the problem is that probably only those who do not need it understand the meaning of the terms of this target ...

[Christophe]

Very good the last version ...

[Remundo]

yes it is very interesting as a representation.

that sums up so many skirmishes and other shipwrecks forumesques ...

[ABC2019]

it would be interesting to know in which box of the target one puts the fact of accusing others of being "trolls".

That alone allows for instructive statistics

[Christophe]

Easy bin: it's -2 if it's really a troll or -3 if it's a mean insult!

[Obamot]

I had thought about it while doing it! First of all it is interesting to note who is the most bothered by this new version if not the one who practices the new points which are there.

Then tell someone that he is “a troll”Is rather flattering for him, because in case the others ignored him until then, he knows very well that he is a troll because it is a trick not easy to assume and that one can hardly to do it by accident ... It is therefore not an insult but a simple observation of a deliberate and claimed behavior.

And suddenly, if on the contrary he does not assume it: it's simple, he takes a (-) 4 in the “Denial” box