Improve exchanges and Graham's target

philosophical debates and companies.
User avatar
thibr
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 719
Registration: 07/01/18, 09:19
x 264

Improve exchanges and Graham's target




by thibr » 19/09/20, 10:56

Do not take the image of the video directly in the face or for yourself, especially if Izentrop is directing you here. Note from Remundo.

Some thoughts to improve the quality of exchanges on forums and in real life : Wink:


Fuck you little shit. This is a very base way of expressing disagreement. But there is worse. And there are especially much better

Image
3 x

User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 60575
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2687

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Christophe » 19/09/20, 11:13

The theory is good ... remains to be put into practice ... : Cheesy:

I put this topic in my signature! Just to remind everyone, everywhere ... : Idea:
2 x
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 60575
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2687

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Christophe » 19/09/20, 11:32

Also, in the same family, here is the "conjugal violenceometer".

He is misleading because he is not sexually neutral and implies that it is the men who are the aggressors, but let's move on to the form.

It can very well be applied in virtual exchanges ... at least on certain points ...

Violentometer-1.jpg
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 17294
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1510

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Obamot » 20/09/20, 16:42

I have updated Image Image

0D3AF2A9-FF0A-4B2F-AD8F-9C97FDFC0E34.jpeg
1 x
Club of “funny" ABC2019, Izentrop, Sicetaitsimple, Pedrodelavega.
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 8646
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 404

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by ABC2019 » 20/09/20, 17:41

the problem is that probably only those who do not need it understand the meaning of the terms of this target ...
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 60575
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2687

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Christophe » 20/09/20, 17:59

Very good the last version ... : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 9921
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 882

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Remundo » 20/09/20, 19:11

yes it is very interesting as a representation.

that sums up so many skirmishes and other shipwrecks forumesques ... :P
0 x
ImageImageImage
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 8646
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 404

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by ABC2019 » 20/09/20, 19:55

it would be interesting to know in which box of the target one puts the fact of accusing others of being "trolls".

That alone allows for instructive statistics :)
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 60575
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2687

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Christophe » 20/09/20, 20:14

Easy bin: it's -2 if it's really a troll or -3 if it's a mean insult! : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 17294
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1510

Re: Improve exchanges ...




by Obamot » 20/09/20, 20:42

Image I had thought about it while doing it! : Cheesy: First of all it is interesting to note who is the most bothered by this new version if not the one who practices the new points which are there.

Then tell someone that he is “a troll”Is rather flattering for him, because in case the others ignored him until then, he knows very well that he is a troll because it is a trick not easy to assume and that one can hardly to do it by accident ... It is therefore not an insult but a simple observation of a deliberate and claimed behavior.

And suddenly, if on the contrary he does not assume it: it's simple, he takes a (-) 4 in the “Denial” box Image Image
0 x
Club of “funny" ABC2019, Izentrop, Sicetaitsimple, Pedrodelavega.


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 17 guests