Leo Maximus wrote:There is an argument often used by anti-hydrogen: the "formidable" pressure of the bottles, 300 bars is monstrous, who will accept to ride while sitting on such a bomb? But scuba diving cylinders have a working pressure of 230 bars, their test pressure is much higher. Firefighters use composite cylinders with higher pressures and if there has been (at least) one accident it is the consequence of non-compliance with handling instructions. In Peugeot's Hydro-Gen concept car with a hydrogen gas heat pump, there are cylinders manufactured by EADS Composite Aquitaine inflated with 700 bar.
Yes, for sure, a traffic accident is not a "failure to respect the instructions" ... and what to think of the comparison of a non-flammable gas (air) to a highly flammable gas capable of igniting a airship of 234m in 90 seconds (the propagation speed is 2.6m / second at atmospheric pressure with, in the event of an explosion (case of confinement) an energy 10% greater than a natural gas explosion ...
For other open questions:
The consumption in circulation "normal" of the series 7 latest model is of 3.4kg / 100km, that is to say for a density of 0.71kg per liter of liquid hydrogen, it is well in the 50L / 100km, the 80L / 100 have been reached by journalists who "had fun" with the car ...
Knowing that the hydrogen tanks, 150L in the latest version of the 7 series proto, but the total volume is not usable (9.5kg of liquid hydrogen maximum), weigh 145kg empty ...
The energy required (only for liquefaction) is 2.8kw / L in the best case and 3.9kw / L in the worst ... the filling pipe weighs 10kg ... it will muscle motorists ... and the gas station is ~ 100x more expensive than petroleum fuel ...
The "normal" proportion of the type of hydrogen is 25% para-hydrogen and 75% ortho-hydrogen: these proportions are variable according to the conditions of t ° / pressure, the conversion from one type to another is done naturally. ...