As for the increase in electricity, of course I am for it. Like a barrel of oil at $ 100 or $ 200! There's only the money that moves people, so that's where you have to hit. Yet I have a car, not (yet) photovoltaic panels or wind turbines, I consume electricity like everyone else. But I totally agree with you, if the consumer paid the real cost of electricity et the cost of reprocessing the pollution caused by production and use, then, probably it would be more careful than it is now. Anyway, electricity is indirectly indexed to the cost of a barrel, so it will come, just be patient.
Regarding nuclear, the only two problems that really bother me are:
1) It is imposed on us, without consultation (there is only to see the public debate on the epr, what a joke)
2) We implement a technology that we do not master from A to Z
the waste problem.
Otherwise, in itself, producing such a large amount of energy with an atom, I find it amazing!
For your remark on anti-nuclear, and although they concern in particular very good friends of mine, it is quite true (unfortunately)! Most preach a good word that they don't even put up at home. They destroy the message we are trying to get across. But do not generalize anyway, I also know who consumes less than 2000kWh per year, in house and for 5 people and they have all the "normal" comfort.
To finish and to return to the subject, PACs consume 80% nuclear electricity, and that's why I'm against it. If it is powered by a renewable source, I am for PACs, but only in this case.
In this regard it would not tempt you a little PM230 
)? 
and against these p **** ngs of halogen lamp .. 
