GMO = poison, cancer, diseases ... according to Pr. Séralini

[chatelot16]

as recently as this morning allegre, true to himself, claimed
that there was no study on GMOs !!

bof, surely it is not ready for stupidity !!

especially since yesterday he took himself for madam sun by doing
Praise for nuclear power: predicting a significant portion
nuclear power generation ... and this gentleman
thinks he's a scientist !!

I almost answered but not to rot this subject with Allègre I opened another
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post240541.html#240541

[chatelot16]

Besides, when they have to do an autopsy, if you saw the number of resorbed tumors that the human organism can support you would undoubtedly be surprised ...

I am not surprised that when you are in good health you can have tumors that heal on their own!

the danger of a bad product is not necessarily to cause cancer directly ... it can be as serious if it destroys the natural healing mechanism that normally protects us

[plasmanu]

Who has a bag to throw up
You dragged out: the rats


Many scientists highlight methodological and statistical problems in the study claiming the toxicity of GMOs in rats.

Non-representative samples, strain of rats highly predisposed to the development of tumors, lack of information on the experimental device: the French study which hit the headlines on Wednesday by showing an increase in the number of cancers and in the mortality of rats fed with a Monsanto's genetically modified corn is now under fire from critics both in France and abroad.

This 24-hour delay stems from the fact that the scientific community could not have access to the study to appear in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology until Wednesday at 15 p.m. Either well after the media, like Le Nouvel Observateur, who revealed this "scoop" by means of "the signing of a confidentiality clause". At least, this was explained in the morning at Le Figaro, the assistant to Gilles-Eric Séralini, professor of molecular biology at the University of Caen and main author of the study. Result: shock images of rats deformed by monstrous tumors, and definitive comments on the dangerousness of GMOs, "finally proven", circulated all day without it being possible for other scientists to bring the slightest contradiction .
Source Le Figaro
http://sante.lefigaro.fr/actualite/2012 ... -contestee

A paving stone in the corn field.
Why is the GMO study relaunching war among scientists?
The Express
http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/societ ... 63933.html

Edit: if there is war, there are two camps

[Obamot]

I expected a reaction, but frankly not that ...

Of course thepurebred female mice"(And the others, it is according to, that in particular the Pasteur Institute provides laboratories for animal experimentation) are"prone», Since they are specially bred for this purpose! Otherwise how they would have done to test drugs such as Interferon and so many other anti-cancer drugs, on perfectly healthy rats ...!

This is indeed proof of a plot here! Since this is how some researchers (other than those on the GM study in Montsanto) discovered the mechanism of cancer as unnecessary and lawless deregulation VS the "need" for cancer organization! They must therefore - for farms that make a trade - bring rats to the threshold of immune imbalance ... so that cancer develops ...

But agro-pharma watches over the grain ... They are ready, as we see today, to send squads of "pseudo-scientists", ready to discredit any serious and independent study - since it represents a vital danger for their business - This is how they get the ball rolling, and that they punish those who dared to cross the rubicon, break the law of silence and deviate from the "right path" drawn by them. .

Thus, those who supply these rats must be strictly controlled and spied on, reason for all the precautions taken by these courageous researchers, to carry out their work !!! Because they had to get as much confidential seed as laboratory rats. QED.

The explanation is however quite simple. By having authorized the sale of devitalized food to the populations, the health authorities, under the leadership of agro-pharma, have weakened the populations (see the obnoxious Codex-Alimentarius of the WHO, leading to scandals such as the authorization of aspartame containing methanol transforming into formaldehyde in all artificially sweetened foods and which would never be eliminated from the human body again, etc.) and therefore, animal strains adapted to populations - themselves weakened - are needed which will feed on said GMOs.

From this, the conclusions of this study are entirely relevant and correct.

[Janic]

obamot hello
all along the line!

[manet42]

This is not the first time that studies have shown the toxicity of transgenic corn. An English researcher had demonstrated the destruction of liver cells. Monsanto had put pressure on the English government, more subsidies for him ...

We find the same methods: asbestos, pesticides, all nuclear, shale gas ... We should trust scientists, manufacturers and experts supposedly independent.

As for Allègre, I don't understand why the media give him the floor, a scientist who refuses to admit his mistakes

JC

[Christophe]

2 articles on the work of Professor Séralini:

http://www.novethic.fr/novethic/planete ... 132588.jsp

Justice has rendered its verdict in the defamation lawsuit brought by Gilles-Eric Séralini professor of molecular biology at the University of Caen and whistleblower on GMOs, to Marc Fellous, president of the French Association of Plant Biotechnologies, which promotes GMOs.

http://www.novethic.fr/novethic/ecologi ... 138354.jsp

A long-term study conducted by Gilles-Eric Séralini on 200 rats fed with transgenic corn and published in the very serious review "Food and chemical toxicology" shows extremely worrying health effects: rats fed on NK 603 marketed by Monsanto trigger 2 to 3 times more tumors than the others.

There are pictures of the rats that are available but I haven't seen them yet, if someone has them on hand ...

[dedeleco]

To keep this text, before it disappears from the net, faced with the disparagement, even if it seems incredible that these diseases of rats go unnoticed on cows, pigs and humans, who eat these GMOs for a long time, same organic allowed to have 0,9% GMOs in it, like, in the past, for tobacco, asbestos, pesticides, herbicides, biphenol, junk food, medicines and all the other products that soak us, without serious serious study !!!

GMOs: whistleblower Gilles-Eric Séralini wins trial the 19-01-2011
http://www.novethic.fr/novethic/planete ... 132588.jsp

Professor Séralini, specializing in the combined effect of pesticides and GMOs, explains his legal action by " harassment, sidelining and denial of its work ”, excluded from the CNRS and then from INRA, while he has been appointed several times adviser and expert for public authorities on the issue of GMOs. He was in particular part of the Biomolecular Engineering Commission, a statute which allowed him to have access to the authorization request files. "These files contain very confidential information which is never made public, he explains. However, I discovered there, for example, that the toxicity assessments of GMOs intended for food for millions of Europeans had lasted no more than 3 months ! It is a mistake not only scientific, but historical. ”
Le alert launcher, which has studied the effects of the round-up on animals and three varieties of Monsanto corn (MON 863, MON 810, NK 603), reports much higher health risks than those admitted by experts from the American group … And denounces, for more than 10 years, "The opacity that reigns over product evaluations for public health (…) These are the private studies that feed the marketing authorization files, and which have enabled some experts to argue safety, without the rest of the scientific community having a say ". This observation echoes the current Mediator scandal and the conflicts of interest linked to the marketing of products assessed by the laboratories themselves ...

[Christophe]

Yeaahh the return of dedeleco!

[moinsdewatt]

I received my number from the Nouvel Observateur.

The cover: