Eva Joly campaign 2012. Candidate and President ... one day?

[bamboo]

it is not THE French, but the nuclear employees and their subcontractors and suppliers who represent a [...]

2/3 of the French are for nuclear
I heard it on the radio and it says here:

Despite the events of Fukushima, the 58% French population remains pro-nuclear.

Average French makes fun of the origin as long as they can continue to consume.

We totally agree. And he thinks it costs him less if it's nuclear (which is probably true in the SHORT-TERM).

In addition to an era of significant unemployment, there is no question of adding more!

Precisely, we could invest in energies for the future, rather than stubbornly with the energies of the past ...

[chatelot16]

that's why stopping stupidly nuclear power plants stupidly believe that it will put people out of work

you have to look the other way! building what it takes to go nuclear will make a lot of people work

For example, building good, well-insulated and well-placed housing will save both housing and transport savings by avoiding the current housing shortage which leads to waste in transport, worse than waste in heating

this is just an example ... there are multiple things to do to save and produce energy, there is no need to choose the best or wait for the quick fix ... we must build all the small solution which together will be the big solution

[Janic]

2/3 of the French are for nuclear

more precisely, 2/3 of the French do not want to deprive themselves, the decrease has not, for the moment the wind in its sails. Moreover, through the media, the lobbies put pressure to generate fear of scarcity in a society that revolves around electricity. If these same French people were certain that they would not run out of electricity through alternative systems, they would all agree because everyone is aware of the potential risks of atomic power plants and the problem of waste reprocessing as much as of the deconstruction of power plants. . If the general public knew that some of the irradiated materials end up in their everyday objects, they would be less "for". But the media are muzzled, especially television.

[Christophe]

Correction for the sake of intellectual honesty: 2/3 of French people are for electricity cheap nuclear.

But they forget to count the real cost of nuclear power: as with public debt, they are putting it back on the backs of their children!

Rather ask them the question if they would prefer nuclear or renewable at the same price?

[bamboo]

Correction for the sake of intellectual honesty: 2/3 of French people are for electricity cheap nuclear.

But they forget to count the real cost of nuclear power: as with public debt, they are putting it back on the backs of their children!

Absolutely.
This is why our aspiring elect follow the trend.

[chatelot16]

Correction for the sake of intellectual honesty: 2/3 of French people are for electricity cheap nuclear.

But they forget to count the real cost of nuclear power: as with public debt, they are putting it back on the backs of their children!

Rather ask them the question if they would prefer nuclear or renewable at the same price?

it is not the french who forget to count the real price of nuclear: it is the state which forgets to make it pay

if EDF or areva or I do not know who paid the real price of the risk and the elimination of waste nuclear electricity would be more expensive ... and would immediately make profitable all the means to do without it

of course it's not a very good way to get elected than to promise a big increase in electricity

it would however be so effective to supplement by lowering the VAT to 0,00% of all activities of high ecological interest

[Christophe]

The relentlessness of the French press on her last days on Eva Joly speaks volumes about the danger it could represent for some ...
http://www.arretsurimages.net/contenu.php?id=4507

Several covers deserve libel lawsuits, including this one:

You wouldn't believe it, but they can sometimes be biting at Le Figaro! And the catchphrase, responsible for selling this number to us on the site, is worth its weight in impertinence: “This week, on the cover of Figaro Magazine, Écolo Dingo. Crazy ideas in shambles, repetitive psychodramas against the backdrop of electoral drums, a program that extends beyond the far left on his left, without forgetting the follies of Eva Joly, the maneuvers of Cécile Duflot, the embarrassment of François Hollande . Le Figaro Magazine invites you this week to a funny trip to the land of the Greens. Welcome to zozology! "Mazette, no joke!

I knew it was not flying high at Figaro but at this point there ... not frankly ... Where are we going ???

[Christophe]

Well: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmupqf ... monde_news

[dedeleco]

The newspapers had better talk about the various chemical pollutions which make dead, not that at the ecologists (probably less because more wary) like asbestos and the multiplication of quite a lot of cancers by 2 and even some by 4 which affect all French !!

And the right-wing newspapers and their readers will laugh less when they are sick or driven from their homes like 11 farmers in Mayenne, ( https://www.econologie.com/forums/post218850.html#218850
)
and will laugh even less after a Fukushima-Chernobyl in France, emptying an entire region of its inhabitants for centuries, certain disaster, sooner or later, since humans are not infallible perpetually !!

[manet42]

Hello,

Ah, Claude ALLEGRE in the Figaro magazine, isn't that a felony? He, a former left minister ...
I know him there, not always present in front of his students, negation of global warming, obstinate refusing to accept his mistakes:
In 76, director of the Institute of Physics of the Globe, he evacuated 70 people around the Soufriere volcano against the advice of H.TAZIEFF in expertise on the site. As director after controversy, he fired him ... discipline, discipline.
We hadn't heard it for a while. A good recruit for this newspaper. It's not pretty pretty