Water memory was found. Benveniste / Montagnier
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79374
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11064
Water memory was found. Benveniste / Montagnier
A doc5 frXNUMX to see absolutely, the return of the memory of water: http://youtube.com/watch?v=EBZ1J-n1pqU
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13726
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1526
- Contact :
Hello,
An old smokehouse that returns to the carpet
http://www.hoaxbuster.com/forum/memoire ... -la-preuve
An old smokehouse that returns to the carpet
http://www.hoaxbuster.com/forum/memoire ... -la-preuve
0 x
"The dogs are barking, but the trailer goes by."
volunteer
He was far from being an old man! His work on the memory of water earned him to be sidelined because it disturbed the thinking people of his time, who made current followers as evidenced by the ignorant who express themselves here.
volunteer
He achieved notoriety in 1971 (at 36) by the discovery of a factor activating blood platelets, PAF-Acether.
In 1973, he entered INSERM where he continued the rest of his career. He will direct several research units there, and will be the advisor to Jean-Pierre Chevènement, then Minister of Research, from 1981 to 1983.
He was far from being an old man! His work on the memory of water earned him to be sidelined because it disturbed the thinking people of his time, who made current followers as evidenced by the ignorant who express themselves here.
0 x
- Grelinette
- Econologue expert
- posts: 2007
- Registration: 27/08/08, 15:42
- Location: Provence
- x 272
The report is very interesting.
I am surprised at the controversy over the single "job"(I do not say" discovery ") of Professor Montagnier.
As he often says: ""experience shows that there are facts". Afterwards, we may or may not agree with the explanations and hypotheses put forward by Prof. Montagnier.
What bothers me in this debate, however concerning scientists, is that the detractors remain firmly anchored in their disagreements and oppositions on the "concept" of the memory of water and its assumptions, but do not seem to contradict the simple one. result of the experiment described, and which would show (conditional) that information has passed from one test tube to another, perhaps carried by water molecules.
I have not read it anywhere, but is there at least 1 other scientist or 1 other lab who has tried to reproduce the experiment which highlights a possible trace of the presence of a substance having been in contact with the diluted and coded aqueous solution?
This heated debate is all the more incomprehensible since the experience, as explained in the film, seems very simple and within the reach of many laboratories and scientists.
If all this is piped up or wrong, which is possible, it should be simple to prove it scientifically and by something other than opposition speeches only argued by dogmas based on scientific knowledge today.
("E pur si muove!" Had said a certain controversial researcher)
I am surprised at the controversy over the single "job"(I do not say" discovery ") of Professor Montagnier.
As he often says: ""experience shows that there are facts". Afterwards, we may or may not agree with the explanations and hypotheses put forward by Prof. Montagnier.
What bothers me in this debate, however concerning scientists, is that the detractors remain firmly anchored in their disagreements and oppositions on the "concept" of the memory of water and its assumptions, but do not seem to contradict the simple one. result of the experiment described, and which would show (conditional) that information has passed from one test tube to another, perhaps carried by water molecules.
I have not read it anywhere, but is there at least 1 other scientist or 1 other lab who has tried to reproduce the experiment which highlights a possible trace of the presence of a substance having been in contact with the diluted and coded aqueous solution?
This heated debate is all the more incomprehensible since the experience, as explained in the film, seems very simple and within the reach of many laboratories and scientists.
If all this is piped up or wrong, which is possible, it should be simple to prove it scientifically and by something other than opposition speeches only argued by dogmas based on scientific knowledge today.
("E pur si muove!" Had said a certain controversial researcher)
0 x
Project of the horse-drawn-hybrid - The project econology
"The search for progress does not exclude the love of tradition"
"The search for progress does not exclude the love of tradition"
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5111
- Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
- Location: Isére
- x 554
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Yes, personally I would not put my hand in the fire that "the water would have no memory"!
Aren't we made up of 65% water ourselves? If so, our own memory is therefore well composed of this water, at least up to this value there (and much more proportionally if we remove the bones). Even if I know that the electro-biological organization of the human body is not at all comparable (it's just an example story to demonstrate certain certainties ...)
On the other hand, I would also await evidence to affirm that this would possibly be the case in the absolute of still water ...
Aren't we made up of 65% water ourselves? If so, our own memory is therefore well composed of this water, at least up to this value there (and much more proportionally if we remove the bones). Even if I know that the electro-biological organization of the human body is not at all comparable (it's just an example story to demonstrate certain certainties ...)
On the other hand, I would also await evidence to affirm that this would possibly be the case in the absolute of still water ...
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 33 Replies
- 17279 views
-
Last message by Cuicui
View the latest post
27/07/14, 22:59A subject posted in the forum : Science and Technology
Back to "Science and Technology"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 107 guests