DrBombay wrote:Hello,
If we refer to the fundamentals of forum, “clean energy” should excite you, or is it only the endless bickering about society that excites you?
econo.jpg
On the subject of clean energy, there was recently Peterr who seems rather confusing to follow, if not impossible, let's move on.
What do you say about this one connected to TESLA (clean energy) and which seems serious? (gear, videos, explanations)
...
There are thousands of devices on YouTube purporting to provide free, clean energy. And of course in the 20 years that we've had them, nothing concrete has ever come out of this bullshit coming from pseudo-inventors in search of recognition, who think they're Tesla, or from scammers and fraudsters who make their money with potential investors, or by selling plans, kits or books. Akula who has been hanging around for years on YouTube and his acolytes on the forum of free energy is certainly a good example.
But the little scams of the handyman Akula are very pathetic. There are much larger ones, notably the current one, the Smart Electromagnetic Generator (AISEG) presented in Dubai during COP28, which would be based on the laws of Biot-Savart and Faraday to which new principles would have been applied. added, obtained by artificial intelligence. The device would have the support of the University of Seoul, while being claimed to produce more energy than it is supplied with! See here :
https://www.youtube.com/@sempworld..
Yet a simple tour of their site
https://www.semp.or.kr/en shows us that they have all the symptoms of a scam (I can elaborate on debunking this type of ad if necessary).
1KW at the input, 5 KW at the output, not bad?! It is in the measurement report of one of the companies which would have appraised the device:
notary certificate.
Finally, we must not believe that because the energy would be clean, the system would have the support of the environmentalist world. Clean, cheap energy would trigger a tremendous economic rebound and unprecedented new industrial developments. It would therefore be opposed by most ecologists, since it would be the complete opposite of a return to the Middle Ages.