It is a question of energy surunity, via a particular coil, called the Tesla coil or even the Tesla Coil.
In my opinion, to consider that all the energy of the resonance is in 40pF is wrong, even if it takes 40pF to tune the resonance according to the value of self that it measures.
There is a lot of capacity distributed all along the coil. It is the capacity between the turns and the environment including the ground.
These are capas which are not charged to the maximum potential and which influence the resonant frequency downwards.
The highest potential which interests us for the calculation of the output energy, is at the end of the coil, therefore in the torus.
Depending on whether we consider that the torus acts as a capacitor with the ground only or with the ground and the ceiling, C torus varies between 3.5pF and 7pF. (estimate according to the dimensions in the video)
Maybe a little more considering ionization. I do not know how to estimate this point.
The point that bothers me in a good way for him, is that for the dielectric strength of the air, it takes 1KV / mm, which is valid for an air saturated with humidity. I doubt that is the case with his lab.
The commonly accepted value is rather 3KV / mm
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigidit%C ... 9lectrique
Which would give an arc of 3MV and not of 1MV. Which is a lot more energy output than it advertises, since the voltage is squared in the energy calculation.
At the level of the output energy, we would have as a function of C torus:
Es = ½ C V² = between 15.7J and 31.5J
The repetition rate per second being 150
We obtain a total energy output Es, between 2355 J and 4725 J
As input, it does not exceed 1KW continuously, so 1000J indeed.
Which give a COP between 2.3 and 4.7.
I spent time doing simulations, where theoretically we shouldn't see a COP> 1 appear in classic software.
This is the case, I reach at best 0.84 for a single RLC, or even 0.9 by counting the 2 RLC of a virtual Tesla Coil.
This argues that working in reality with very high tension, would bring an energy which would come from who knows where.
It seems unlikely to me that the apparent COP is due to an error on the input 'measurement'.
It seems unlikely to me that the power supply does not deliver peaks of power which go unnoticed, the time that it does not regulate according to the load which varies.
Still it would be necessary to have the precise diagram to say it, and even better, of the readings with the oscilloscope of the tension and the current.
If I didn't miss anything, for me it highlighted the overunity. which is a major breakthrough in science.
It's up to you to make me lie (bring contradiction that I did not see)
Here is a new energy that is the door open to clean (non-carbon), abundant and non-intermittent energy for a viable future.
his chain: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZn_Rm ... BxQ/videos
FB: https://www.facebook.com/Promethelios/
website: https://www.promethelios.fr/