Chartrousin wrote:That's fine, but that's the purpose of mandatory ECD, no? it already gives, during a real estate transaction, a conso normalized on an average year in kWh / m².year, with a translation into euros and quantity of fuel, with also the classification letter ABCDE ... Given that the formula of calculation is normalized, the result is supposed to be relatively objective, and allow the comparison of different dwellings, and thus influence the choice of the buyer.
Unfortunately, it is still necessary that the dpe is well done, sometimes it is far in reality, but it is another problem, that of putting into practice.
Yes, but how is a real estate DPE established? Simply ... by analyzing previous energy bills... It is also realized by estate agents who can not distinguish, in most cases, kW and kWh ...
So the DPE is based more on the habits of the old inhabitants than the thermal performance of housing ...
Examples: The Hecolo family never heated more than 18 ° C sells his house with an excellent DPE based on his bills ... rated A +!
This DPE will have nothing to do with the DPE family Jmencogne who bought the house and heating it to 24 ° C: the consumption goes to G according to the same method of DPE ...
If the DPE was based on the DJU this paradox would not be possible ... but it will have required a constant measurement of the average T ° of housing ... necessarily it is harder than adding some figures on a bill.
So DPE = nice joke but it's better than nothing!