Rajqawee wrote:So I read the study on F1.
Well, if we take the 8400 T of CO² emitted, and divide by the number of spectators (only ...) which is 65 (figure from the study), that makes ... oh my god 000T of CO² per spectator! That is to say the equivalent of 0,12 terminals traveled by car ... It puts a little perspective anyway.
And there, we did not even count the viewers, who however also benefit from the event. And this is considering that the utility is only for spectators, not runners or teams (which is wrong).
In short, it does not seem to me so disproportionate at all.
Ah? Because you find “tolerable and not disproportionate” 65 equivalent km traveled for a few hours of racing? Because calculated in the other direction that's it ...
In addition, these 8400 T of CO2 omitted a lot of things (from memory, not reread the study since ...), in particular gray CO2 because the study and manufacture of the means (circuits and cars) do not seem to me taken into account ... (I may be wrong)
Finally, bread, games ... we know the adage ...