Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16183
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5263

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Remundo » 28/02/24, 21:54

by accident or chance, yes, exceptionally, it happens :P Being the Macronie parrot doesn't help.
0 x
Image
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13724
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1526
Contact :

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by izentrop » 28/02/24, 22:56

The page turns and so much the better...
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16183
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5263

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Remundo » 28/02/24, 23:58

Thanks for your trash tweets. it occupies the land.
0 x
Image
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13724
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1526
Contact :

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by izentrop » 29/02/24, 01:59

It's another truth than yours... Which one is the right one? :?: : Idea: 8) : Lol:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Christophe » 07/03/24, 22:55

izentrop wrote:It's another truth than yours... Which one is the right one? :?: : Idea: 8) : Lol:


In your table, inevitably and strongly biased, at least the "All the unvaccinated will be dead within 6 months"...
0 x
Robob
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 905
Registration: 12/04/13, 14:28
x 1242

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Robob » 09/03/24, 11:27

Christophe wrote:
izentrop wrote:It's another truth than yours... Which one is the right one? :?: : Idea: 8) : Lol:


In your table, inevitably and strongly biased, at least the "All the unvaccinated will be dead within 6 months"...

there is only one truth and this painting mixes bullshit with big lies.

A scientifically sourced example for Izy the lobotomized, and to shorten the list which would be too long:

stupid.jpg
débile.jpg (53.49 KB) Consulted 592 times


True answer: The vaccine modifies our DNA “this is quite possible and needs to be confirmed”.

it has been demonstrated experimentally that vaccine mRNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/
"MRNA vaccines: why is the biology of retroposition ignored?"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164063/
“Intracellular reverse transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in vitro in a human liver cell line.”

The localization of the Spike protein in the nucleus has already been reported:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670843/
A systemic and molecular study of the subcellular localization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins

The spike protein also transported the spike mRNA to the nucleus:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909199/
Nuclear translocation of mRNA and spike protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

Circulating vaccine mRNA and spike protein have been detected in plasma weeks to months after vaccination:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313234/
Vaccine mRNA can be detected in the blood 15 days after vaccination
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8241425/
Circulating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antigen detected in plasma of mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients

Vaccine mRNA in the lymph nodes of most subjects 30 days after exposure:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533894/
Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac injury in recently vaccinated patients

Modified ribonucleotides are incorporated into the mRNAs of COVID-19 vaccines. Their effects on mRNA translation fidelity resulted in +1 ribosomal frameshifting in vitro and cellular immunity in humans:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764286/
N 1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes a +1 ribosomal frameshift

It remains to be demonstrated that the modified products overlap with endogenous protein sequences and may contribute to the development of autoimmune responses. As can be understood from the numerous studies below, this is a more than probable hypothesis.
2 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13724
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1526
Contact :

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by izentrop » 10/03/24, 00:33

Bullshit mentioned by Raoult and the Epoch Times of course obviously : Mrgreen: https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.324T2HJ

More serious: Serious failings denounced but not followed up by scientific bodies which are not doing their job.
While Didier Raoult's fame was partly built thanks to his scientific publications, it was ultimately from Science that the final coup de grace came. In a long article published Thursday March 7, the prestigious journal devotes the work of the whistleblowers who investigated, criticized and denounced the fraudulent studies of the Marseille professor.

An investigation by journalist Victor Garcia appears in L'Express, another follows in Mediapart, in Le Point... L'Igas follows, and points out anomalies. “The IHU multiplied wild research, they carried out studies after each other and all their results were rotten,” points out the specialist. They compared cabbages and carrots, excluding patients from the panel so that the results would go their way. It was not science, but belief! »

Concretely, the work that we did should have been that of the CNRS, Inserm, the government… It was not our job, we were not protected, and we had to manage everything alone. We questioned ministers, and we only got evasive and generic answers... We are waiting for real answers, real communication on what is happening and what happened. »
https://www.lepoint.fr/sante/science-ce ... _40.php#11
0 x
Robob
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 905
Registration: 12/04/13, 14:28
x 1242

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Robob » 11/03/24, 18:32

izentrop wrote:Bullshit mentioned by Raoult and the Epoch Times of course obviously : Mrgreen: https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.324T2HJ
+uninteresting blabla to distract attention.

Your AFP article dates from March 2022. You should at least read when I make the effort to source my statements:

All of the studies that I cited largely contradict the propagandistic and dangerous elements of the AFP.

AFP: “the integration of messenger RNA into our genome was not possible if only because the RNA does not enter the nucleus of the cell but remains in the cytoplasm.”

Lies already back then, see 2020 study:
The localization of the Spike protein in the nucleus has already been reported:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670843/
A systemic and molecular study of the subcellular localization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

Confirmed in 2023 for SARS-CoV-2:
The spike protein also transported the spike mRNA to the nucleus:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909199/
Nuclear translocation of mRNA and spike protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

I do not understand this attitude to reject or ignore any scientific study showing the weaknesses of this new technology which has proven its ineffectiveness in the case of covid but which could nevertheless be effective for truly lethal diseases.
Is it possible, rather than insulting Raoult or stigmatizing the truly independent media which warn, to quantify these risks mentioned by studies rather than denying them outright to protect the corrupt?
3 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13724
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1526
Contact :

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by izentrop » 11/03/24, 22:02

All that conspiracy bullshit.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064

Re: Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of Hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic




by Christophe » 12/03/24, 12:59

izentrop wrote:All that conspiracy bullshit.


Well, you didn't respond to these conspiratorial comments:

Christophe wrote:
izentrop wrote:It's another truth than yours... Which one is the right one? :?: : Idea: 8) : Lol:


In your table, inevitably and strongly biased, at least the "All the unvaccinated will be dead within 6 months"...


: Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Robob and 259 guests