WHO: pollution of air = 7 2012 million deaths in

[Christophe]

Here ... you got it all!

However, there must be some estimates of future deaths of RC ... but the margin of error may be around 1000% ...

[Christophe]

A new study has just been released, the death toll from pollution has risen to 8.8 million (I would have thought more ...):

society-and-philosophy / the-dictatorship-against-pollution-and-climate-change-t16333.html # p382939

[GuyGadebois]

A new study has just been released, the death toll from pollution has risen to 8.8 million (I would have thought more ...):

I think that if you could add to this figure the deaths by pollution of food, water and soil, you would see your figure explode in staggering proportions!

[Christophe]

Reread the title of this topic

Otherwise ok

[GuyGadebois]

Reread the title of this topic

Otherwise ok

Too restrictive, the title of the subject. But chief yes chief, you have chief, chief reason!

[ABC2019]

A new study has just been released, the death toll from pollution has risen to 8.8 million (I would have thought more ...):

I think that if you could add to this figure the deaths by pollution of food, water and soil, you would see your figure explode in staggering proportions!

in food, it's not pollution that kills the most, but just because we eat too much, and in particular too much sugar, salt, and fats. What is your BMI?

[Janic]

in food, it’s not the pollution that kills the most, but just because we eat too much , and especially too much sugar, salt, and fat. What is your BMI?

in animal experiments where each food portion is strictly studied; it is indeed food pollution that will make the difference between organic and non-organic, for example.

[ABC2019]

in food, it’s not the pollution that kills the most, but just because we eat too much , and especially too much sugar, salt, and fat. What is your BMI?

in animal experiments where each food portion is strictly studied; it is indeed food pollution that will make the difference between organic and non-organic, for example.

I'm talking to you about the real origin of diseases in the real world. This is mainly due to a problem of quantity of different foods, more than quality. For your health, it is much better to eat vegetables and pesticides in reasonable quantities than to eat organic fries.

Similarly, the main advantage of cycling from a health point of view is not the reduction in pollution or CO2 emissions, but the physical exercise it provides.

[Christophe]

Stop!!

There is a topic for junk food mortality: Health-pollution-prevention / supply-and-junk-hungry-and-malnutrition-disease-t10399.html

[Christophe]

Similarly, the main advantage of cycling from a health point of view is not the reduction in pollution or CO2 emissions, but the physical exercise it provides.

The absence of local pollution (particles, cov, co ...) is still to be highlighted with human propulsion!

For CO2 yes it is less obvious ... a muscle with a performance similar to that of an engine ... and we eat 2L of equivalent oil per day ...