Ahmed wrote:On the question of violence is addressed in this film, it would probably legitimate if clear ideas about the goals and means of achieving them existed; However, if these conditions were met, violence would be useless ...
In the current state, violence would only come up against more violence and increase the general level of violence ...
Indeed, the violence only strengthens securitarianism ...
Revolutionary movements often see in such measures a certain forms of salvation, when in reality this type of action only reinforces the powers that be and often leads to the death of innocents.
The study of history shows brilliantly, moreover, that most violent acts known as "revolutionary" are in fact orchestrated by intelligence services manipulating useful idiots ...
The violent act as solutions to complex problems are often the work that disturbed individuals and limited intelligence.
I think the need to return to the Stone Age is a conceptual necessity, but can not justify that only through this narrow focus.
It's pretty sad to see that as soon as we talk about decay, we're talking about going back to the Stone Age.
This idea is even more stupid that such action is totally inapplicable to the fact that in addition to not attract any suffrage it would cause the death of almost all of the people!
It is in fact an argument widely disseminated by the priests of the economy, the goal being to create a fear aiming to make believe that the only outcome of our species would be in the growth: "
Without growth, there is no salvation ".
In reality if we continue in this "exponentialist" madness we will indeed end up in a Stone Age caused by an ecological catastrophe and / or a third world conflict!
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.