Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[izentrop]

Raoult fires his cutie

[Janic]

and the izymentor who trool once more
https://www.upr.fr/actualite/entretien- ... -le-covid/
when Raoult talks about the fact that the vaccinated die less than the unvaccinated, he is talking ONLY about the elderly in nursing homes, where people are waiting to die and where psychological manipulations are the strongest. In fact the reassured vaccinated see their immune system go back to good shape, a necessary condition for the system, and on the other hand the unvaccinated remain in an ambient environment of rejection, mistrust, guilt, alone against everyone and in particular the medical profession, which does not promote good immune function, but which has nothing to do with the vaccine itself, what raoult, he, knows perfectly well.

[Robob]

...
Hydroxychloroquine does not work, our figures are rigged (claimed by “additional investigation”), a bailiff confirms our data.
Our latest work, checked by a bailiff, reports a 70% reduction in deaths in patients treated early and 40% out of 30 patients hospitalized between 000 and 2020, i.e. 2021 to 800 deaths avoided in Marseille (online study).

Yes, but it's illegal.

This was not noted by the visit dependents of 8 inspectors for 7 months (ANSM, IGAS, IGAESRI) nor by the opinion of the Director General of Health (Pr Salomon) consulted in 2022.

These results are comparable to those of the summary of the ''early C19'' site (visible on the internet) based on 393 studies including 500 people.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

Is it illegal to save people? It is becoming urgent that an independent commission examine these results, which are all available on the internet.

For Izy: he asks for a commission self-employed. I have highlighted the important passages for you.

[Janic]

Is it illegal to save people?

not only is it not illegal, but even required by law to save people in mortal danger. But the macrond clique never examines the laws, they make others annihilating the previous ones.

[izentrop]

results are comparable to those of the synthesis of the ''early C19'' site (

poh poh poh ... a bogus site and a bailiff to validate a scientific study, is that new?

[Janic]

izymentor

poh poh poh ... a bogus site and a bailiff to validate a scientific study, is that new?

and it's a pseudo scientist who is a great specialist in bogus fake news who says that.
He is so bad that he does not know that a bailiff does not issue any personal opinion and that he is content to record documents that everyone can consult in the event of a dispute or dispute between the opposing parties, that is the zeteticians of carnival!

[Christophe]

Vaccines and lies
As often a certain press loves to distort my words, this time it's the ''conjuration of imbeciles'' in delirium on vaccines, tomorrow it will be on treatments!
We found in 2021 a lower mortality in elderly vaccinated subjects (over 75 years old). This is in accordance with what I have always said and written (war diaries tome 1 page 337 and war diaries tome 2 page 319) and published with P. E Fournier. Some journalists do not know how to hear or read... There are no deaths among those under 50, apart from the very rare subjects at risk (down syndrome and obese) in the IHU as in Sweden (one death in 10 infected) when caring for the sick. In young people, vaccination has never had any benefit but side effects. Vaccination does not protect against infection and contagion and Pfizer had not tested or evaluated them. Generalized vaccination was useless, 000 months after its implementation, we knew that the vaccination obligation did not make sense because there were as many cases among the vaccinated as among the unvaccinated on my daily monitoring screen. It is our rulers who have changed their minds, not me, I have no opinion because only the facts interest me. Finally, we know that vaccination does not protect against Omicron. I don't have data on the protection of the elderly concerning Omicron from 6 because my work has been stopped!!! We broke the thermometer!!! He did not give the temperature of the government!!!
It's scary, the people who are supposed to inform you don't know how to listen or read!

https://twitter.com/raoult_didier/status/1661793889462763523

[izentrop]

A fabric of bullshit as usual... The charlatan of the creeks does not get along...

[Robob]

badger.jpg (5.68 KiB) Viewed 286 times

[izentrop]

vaccination has never had any benefit

He constantly contradicts himself , while he said several times: