Christophe wrote:Your answer doesn't really surprise me...is it so difficult to notice your mistake (plus it was you who asked...)? So we attack the messenger?
I spent 2 hours on your equations and writing answers on your subject today (and I don't just have that to do...) and a good hour yesterday doing the wind turbine simulation...so if the subject interests me (interested...because we've covered it) and I'm not upset, I'll explain...
I found your error, point 2 is physically wrong. And Remundo didn't see the mistake either. No problem, to err is human. The error is to persist in the error...
If you don't understand with the example of cars it will be difficult to make things clearer.
If you think it's logical that a recoverable energy curve decreases with speed (when it should only increase)...
If you think that it is logical the shape of the object in the wind does not affect the shape of the recoverable energy curve...
So I can't do much more for you...sorry...
I still suggest you apply for the Nobel Prize in Physics. You never know, maybe you'll be able to convince them...
Here I'll give you the link: https://fr.symbolab.com/solver/functions-line-calculator/f%5Cleft(x%5Cright)%3D%5Cleft(12.5-x%5Cright)%5E%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20x?or=input
Now do what you want, believe what you want...except that physics is not about belief but about facts and correct reasoning.
ps: keep us informed about the Nobel...
You're a little stubborn but I like you Christophe, you have a good heart.
I will wait for you to realize your elementary mistake but I ask you to reward my patience
by offering me your most sincere apologies and your cheeks turning pink with shame when the light returns
and that from the Christ Off state you will have returned to the Christ On state.
Promise me ! I deserve it!