eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:izentrop wrote:Don't put Pedro and me in the same category.
I interpret "nuts" as those who trust established science.
But I trust the science really established! give me one fact scientifically established that I would have denied !!!
I have at least two:
- thermal agitation, combined with a veil of monoatomic graphene, causes an almost ordered reciprocating movement
of this veil of graphene and this movement can be used energetically (like any reciprocating movement ...)
- Or that the RCA is not a problem which would require to be concerned about it.
bad luck, none of these proposals is scientifically established, or you have to tell me by whom and how.