Mysterious spots in intensively cultivated agricultural fields?

[Obamot]

Yes, but what about double blind double shadows *? This is where we would need to be enlightened ...

* Carefully randomized, but that goes without saying ...

Yes, carefully ...
Yet it is easy to understand, the paraglider was teleported into two subjective dimensions of space-time, and it transcended the shadows in informal substrate of space-time in two different places! Hence the change in chromatic polarity: everything is explained!

[Exnihiloest]

Well, not exactly, the spots are larger vertically above the camera and smaller in the distance, and the further you go ...

It rather attests to the perspective effect.
If they were clouds, besides that we have never seen this effect before and that they would be tiny therefore not thick enough to make such a shadow, as we see in the photo you added, we would also see these shadows on the green areas but this is not the case.
So it's good that it's tied to the ground.

[Obamot]

The green would have been too dense anyway for the shadows to be seen.
I prefer the quantum explanation, which is more poetic

[Ahmed]

I thank you, Obamot: thanks to your learned explanations, it is much clearer for me now.

I still have a quick question, if I may : why would round clouds appear in this form and not in that of ovals in the low sun?
Edit: am I stupid! It was obviously cloud balls, well known to specialists ...

[altigo]

Hello, if this field has been cleared recently (less than 80 years old) it could be the traces of the old piles of burnt wood

[Ahmed]

Some sort of terra preta substitute, in a way? The piles seem to me very close to credit this hypothesis: on such a surface, the guys would not have hesitated to push the branches on only a few large braziers (this is what has been done since the generalization of the use of tractors) .

I also observe the strange persistence of a stain in the form of an accent on the "a" of the title, however it would not be an impossible task to clean it ...

[Christophe]

I thank you, Obamot: thanks to your learned explanations, it is much clearer for me now.

I still have a quick question, if I may : why would round clouds appear in this form and not in that of ovals in the low sun?

You definitely haven't understood anything about Obagrotesque Quantum Theory! Yet it is clear: if Obamot is right, Obamot is right. If Obamot is wrong, Obamot is right!

Mouahaha what are we laughing at here! I didn't think this topic would interest you that much!

[Ahmed]

See how you are We must believe that it is precisely his lack of interest that makes all its charm, by a paradigmatic dialectical inversion ...

[Obamot]

No, if you want a rational explanation, I was wrong, I failed to take this into account. But he was questioned by what we see with the black arrow, I was lured by this pseudo drop shadow, possibly assuming that others did not see themselves according to a different slope of the terrain (or something coming from the bad micro-contrasts of the “minus” sensors). And in fact it was the opposite, I should have seen that because of this site, the ears were not on the feet but had possibly already been cut. I had zoomed into the vertical photo afterwards, but was not convinced by that. I also admit that I was deceived by the fact that the very long shadows cast in the red circle could possibly come from a very high relief, like a piece of land located on the side of a cliff, which then placed the Sun quite high. in this case, hence the fact that considering it plausible, I was not surprised by the shape of the spots, hence my reflections on the color temperatures (which then stood). But there were several contradictory elements, which is why I could not have been more cautious and did not assert anything.

[Exnihiloest]

... Mouahaha what are we having here! I didn't think this topic would interest you that much!

You present a mystery to the intellectual elite of this site. It's a challenge ! Obviously, she answers present!