Vaccinations and health ... for or against?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).

vaccinations

You can select 1 option

 
 
Consult the results
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13742
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1528
Contact :

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by izentrop » 01/03/23, 02:14

Christophe wrote:Bouffon 1er continues to make people laugh...
still missed : Mrgreen:
You should trust a professional like the Doc more, because
The vaccine prevents infection with the human papillomavirus, a group of viruses that cause 90% of cervical cancer cases. Australia was one of the first countries to implement a national vaccination program for girls in 2007, then to include boys from 2013. The HPV vaccination rate there is one of the highest raised in the world. As a result, HPV rates among women aged 18-24 fell from 22% to 1% between 2005 and 2015. In the UK, the vaccine has been given to girls at ages 12 and 13 since 2008, and in 2019 it was offered to adolescent boys for the first time. A recent study funded by Cancer Research UK (Nov 2021) found that rates of cervical cancer in women who were offered the vaccine between the ages of 12 and 13 (now aged 20 ) were 87% lower than in an unvaccinated population.
https://lepetitjournal.com/singapour/sa ... rus-333757 : Wink:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Janic » 01/03/23, 07:51

without forgetting, the young girls vaccinated and handicapped for life after this poisonous vaccine! To believe that in Australia and elsewhere the medics do not know how to fight against viruses, or quite the contrary by treating vaccinated and unvaccinated which reduces the total number of victims.
The late Montagnier asserted that viruses were only dangerous when a non-protective lifestyle allowed their spread, including HIV at the time.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79431
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11088

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Christophe » 01/03/23, 09:31

izentrop wrote:
Christophe wrote:Bouffon 1er continues to make people laugh...
still missed : Mrgreen:
You should trust a professional like the Doc more, because
The vaccine prevents infection with the human papillomavirus, a group of viruses that cause 90% of cervical cancer cases. Australia was one of the first countries to implement a national vaccination program for girls in 2007, then to include boys from 2013. The HPV vaccination rate there is one of the highest raised in the world. As a result, HPV rates among women aged 18-24 fell from 22% to 1% between 2005 and 2015. In the UK, the vaccine has been given to girls at ages 12 and 13 since 2008, and in 2019 it was offered to adolescent boys for the first time. A recent study funded by Cancer Research UK (Nov 2021) found that rates of cervical cancer in women who were offered the vaccine between the ages of 12 and 13 (now aged 20 ) were 87% lower than in an unvaccinated population.
https://lepetitjournal.com/singapour/sa ... rus-333757 : Wink:


Your 87% can't be seen in the curves of the tweet...so who's lying? The observational or the golden balls peers?

I didn't know that "rate" was synonymous with "cancer" in French... but hey, nothing surprises me anymore in Bouffonerie...
2 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13742
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1528
Contact :

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by izentrop » 01/03/23, 10:24

Christophe wrote:Your 87% can't be seen in the curves of the tweet...so who's lying? The observational or the golden balls peers?

I didn't know that "rate" was synonymous with "cancer" in French... but hey, nothing surprises me anymore in Bouffonerie...
No chart source.
As the guy is an assumed antivax, no need for real proof, everything that can go in his direction is true for him as for you.

Sorry but I prefer to listen to competent and honest professionals who get their hands dirty and who can prove to you through reliable sources what they are saying. : Lol:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79431
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11088

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Christophe » 01/03/23, 10:28

If there is a source, read better...
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13742
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1528
Contact :

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by izentrop » 01/03/23, 10:44

Christophe wrote:If there is a source, read better...
Not the page that explains the curves, which is certainly not what this "energy entrepreneur" deduces from it : roll:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Janic » 01/03/23, 12:57

izmentor
As the guy is an assumed antivax, no need for real proof, everything that can go in his direction is true for him as for you.
the iznaz'y conploplo which provides the stick to be beaten. He is maso the zigoto because it is just as possible to write this:
As the izy is an assumed provax, no need for real proof, everything that can go in its direction is true for him.
izmentor
Sorry but I prefer to listen to competent and honest professionals who get their hands dirty and who can prove to you through reliable sources what they are saying.
Where are they hiding these competent et honest? Competence is found in all those who have been qualified by state diplomas: and where is your competence? and I'm not talking about honesty, the real meaning of which you don't even know!
when the evidence is still waiting for yours!
Note that when the vaxmachin tap stopped flowing, BP switched to the flu vax and as that is not enough for them they fall back on the papillomavirus, the big joke! And tomorrow on what other hoax will they fall back again to make work the industry of the vaccine illusion for gullible spirits.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16228
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5274

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Remundo » 01/03/23, 13:55

Macron's latest fad, vaccinating young people at guarded...

https://infodujour.fr/sante/65835-mais- ... s-anti-hpv
The Head of State will go today 28/02/2023 to a college in Charente to raise awareness among young people about vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV). But in view of the current data, one can wonder about the real benefits of this prevention.


except that...
An unverifiable benefit on cancer

We therefore vaccinate teenagers (especially girls) in the hope of preventing them from getting cancer 20 or 30 years later.
However, it is impossible for the moment to judge the benefit of vaccination on cancer of the cervix, quite simply because the first adolescent girls vaccinated 17 years ago have not yet reached the age at which this cancer usually occurs, ie 40-50 years. If clinical studies have shown a certain effectiveness of vaccines on infections and lesions due to targeted HPVs, their usefulness in preventing cancer remains at present a guess.
In addition, over such a long time scale (two to three decades), many other factors can intervene in the development or not of genital cancer: lifestyle, sexual practices, methods of contraception, etc. Which makes it difficult, if not impossible, the evaluation of the real role of vaccines in this matter.
Serious side effects

On the other hand, many serious adverse effects have been reported by vaccinated young girls, including autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis or lupus. But also Guillain-Barré syndromes, myasthenia, polymyositis, Verneuil's disease, idiopathic hypersomnia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and other disabling morbid joys with complicated names.
As always with vaccines, the exact number of these victims is not known and most are struggling to have the link between their pathology and vaccination recognized. Some have come together to form the “Girls and Gardasil®” collective to take legal action. According to their lawyer, Camille Kouchner, 1672 cases of adverse effects were recorded between 2006 and 2011, including 352 serious, for more than two million young women vaccinated.

Criminal complaints dismissed


Macron is really the zealous whore of pharma... among other things for his talents as a meticulous liquidator of this country!
3 x
Image
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79431
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11088

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by Christophe » 01/03/23, 13:57

Remundo you're a fucking conspiracy!!

: Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
1 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13742
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1528
Contact :

Re: Vaccinations and health ... for or against?




by izentrop » 01/03/23, 14:08

Christophe wrote:Remundo you're a fucking conspiracy!!

: Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
By quoting a newspaper specializing in disinformation. : Mrgreen:
0 x

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : gegyx and 171 guests