Coronavirus: effectiveness of types of masks and manufacture of a homemade respiratory mask

[Christophe]

perpetual paranoia...
What seems to please Izy who bathes in it with ease for 3 years:

Zizy this morning posted at least 5 acid covidist propaganda messages.

swimming in the "false ease", that's his niche.

Facts, remundo... Can you prove that Philippot didn't say it?

You and your friends are really stupid...instead of fighting against the pandemic you are fighting against humans...probably to hide your own lies!

The personal mask I never stopped wearing it and more and more people are putting it back on right now... without obligation.

In public transport we should never have taken it off...in short...

[Janic]

and some grumble against the wearing of the so-called Islamic veil, while the same will wear the so-called "sanitary" veil (sic) because the dominant system imposes it. The violins should be tuned!

[Obamot]

Nah but you understand Janic, when we say that the virus can pass through the stretched structure of the "non-woven", we retort you but that yes, the mask is still effective since it retains the large droplets charged with particles viral

And since we thus implicitly admit that the virus passes through, that we then produce biodegradable ones in natural fibers (cotton or other) which will not line our lungs with possibly carcinogenic particles (remember asbestos?)

And if we summarize:
— pseudo waxins do not prevent transmission...
— pseudo-masks do not prevent transmission!
— the sinister pseudo of health does not prevent transmission...
— the President substitute 40.3 does not prevent the transmission...
— the super slut Ursula Vrom De La Hyène (not elected) facilitated the transmission.

What a miserable world.

[Janic]

07/12/22, 13:50

Nah but you understand Janic, when we say that the virus can pass through the stretched structure of the "non-woven", we retort you but that yes, the mask is still effective since it retains the large droplets charged with particles viral

and what happens to the viruses in question, nicely stored in a corner of the mask.
How naive to believe that a piece of fabric or plastic can stop the slightest virus, (or the vaccine virus) given its very small size, which necessarily escapes with the exhaled air to more welcoming places. And if it did not escape to the outside, it would immediately be re-breathed increasing, accumulating, these infectious elements in the lungs of the "positive".
As a reminder, the advice to cough in the crook of the elbow and to greet each other by touching each other's elbows! We really take people for idiots who do not think, or more!

[Remundo]

we have talked about this many times.

The light mask only holds the sputters and does not prevent the aerosols from being diffused.

The light mask is not particularly hygienic, including for the wearer (the humid, warm atmosphere around the mouth and nose is favorable to microbial development). In addition, it increases the rate of CO2 inhaled.

The light mask, in my opinion, can be worn in places where people are concentrated and do not make physical effort, and temporarily.

the FFP2 is a little better, but has the same faults (attenuated).

If we really wanted to virally isolate ourselves from each other, we would have to wear a "diving suit" mask with filtration of inspired AND expired air, and probably thermal regulation... very nice subject of engineering and biology!

[Janic]

If we really wanted to virally isolate ourselves from each other, we would have to wear a "diving suit" mask with filtration of inspired AND expired air, and probably thermal regulation... very nice subject of engineering and biology!

absolutely and yet it is obvious in biology precisely. All other "protections are canister, light mask or FFP2

[Exnihiloest]

...
If we really wanted to virally isolate ourselves from each other, we would have to wear a "scuba" mask...

Still lost.

"Le perfect solution fallacy, also called the Nirvana fallacy or even more colloquially the all or nothing fallacy, is a fallacy consisting in disregarding a measure on the grounds that it does not completely solve a problem.."

[Obamot]

Still lost.

Heuh... You shouldn't take YOUR CASE for a generality...

At worst, you could eventually—with phenomenal audacity, and all remorse absent—bet for the "paralogism" (possible) ...and again, you would have to prove it because it's non sequitur. Here..

The sophism (by way of example and without being too mistaken), is reserved for seriously ill people like you, court sessions on errors of fundamental logic, or 'at best' immature subjects, who have not done enough of mental introspection on their little person (and to whom we can still forgive => the case of humus) not in people who are filled with sociability and empathy like Remundo (even with those who are not cool with him , so you lose a great opportunity to shut up, and I hope for you that you will apologize)

This also proves that you use words wrongly and through, your posts resembling logorrhea since regularly you do not know what you are talking about, without even noticing it (which is the characteristic of people who make sophistry, as YOU have just done...)

[izentrop]

Zizy this morning posted at least 5 acid covidist propaganda messages.
swimming in the "false ease", that's his niche.

Facts, remundo... Can you prove that Philippot didn't say it?

You and your friends are really stupid...instead of fighting against the pandemic you are fighting against humans...probably to hide your own lies!

Humans who act like weather vanes out of opportunity?

[Christophe]

The pirouettes are you the tdc of siegvax…

Now that the tide is turning you divert attention...