Idem, development cannot be
"Sustainable" if in the end there had to be the very absence of perspective that it could last (I apologize ^^).
And on the other hand, "a politician" could be anyone! You or me, if apart from certain co-optation rules, we were elected. If this were the case, would we not too quickly be overwhelmed by the magnitude of the problem?
For green-tech, it seems to be the same reasoning as for Désertec ... But they still have the merit of making people think and open up new perspectives. Because what else is there ?! The eco-balance sheet that did not advance the schmilblick ^^
But here we get lost, we get lost ... We are talking about something around the eco-impact relating to consumerism, while the question of the thread was around the
civic sense and ecology? And there ... we should pray very very hard
so that something is going in the right direction through this ...
In short, some are a little harsh with Désertec by brandishing the scarecrow in a kind of
"Solar plunder". Because in the meantime, those opposite with their nuke, they rub their hands ... In the end thermal solar has a better performance than photo-voltaic panels, so what should we think about it? And then whatever happens, with solar, we can loot whatever we want, there will always be ...
It should also be remembered that Désertec will be a significant element of regional stability, that it will bring foreign exchange to countries that do not have huge resources and that only the surplus production, once local needs are met, will be exported! In the meantime they continue to burn wood or oil to heat themselves and with us it is not frankly better ... ^^
A choice between plague and cholera ... that's what we have, isn't it?
