- G7-Biarritz-2019.jpg (40.72 KIO) Accessed 2318 times
There are at least 2 who seem to have fun! (the others make soup with a grimace ...)
In view of the results that followed the previous ones G... , we can say that the G7 is a journalistic "Chestnut", and an "Arlésienne" if we talk about the actions announced and the objectives set!
What is ultimately the interest of such a summit?
Why do the political leaders of the 7 biggest economic powers waste their time to come and talk in the plush lounges of a luxury hotel when they know that none of them has really "interest" to let go ballast on the issues discussed? ...
However, this year what is new is not the demonstrations of opposition, but the "Counter-Summits at G7"which open on all sides.
Not sure that Against-Summits have more effect but it shows that things are moving ... on the side of the opponents.
For my part, I think that better than the G7, there is the G -7 (G min 7): the summit that brings together 7 economically least powerful countries in the world!
Finally it is these countries, the most impacted, who have the most to say about inequalities around the world, global warming and all the things that are getting closer and bigger.
A "G -7"would cost less, would be more timely and the declarations more objective ...
But would the countries of a G-7 have the means of actions to implement the saving actions of our human world?
