Media treatment of the covid crisis: "This is not a conspiracy" by Bernard Crutzen

[Obamot]

I'm not blaming you, but then no ...

Elise Lucet has already made her self-criticism, she is in the same position in the news, as Professor Raoult is in his “health” sector. She said openly that the treatment of the subjects did not depend only on herself, but on those responsible for the (public?) Channel.

If this stance (which I consider courageous) does not take to the streets (by arousing the ire of the public) it is because the populations are in an advanced state of sleep, and this explains why we are in this state. got there ...

We pay dearly for a laxity that extends over decades ... So, the 90% of the population (asleep and / or who has not taken to the street) does not deserve what it deserves? happens (?) and this while everyone pays ...!?

[Janic]

by Obamot »25/11/21, 23:30

I'm not blaming you, but then no ...

I do not take it for a reproach, we start to know each other for a long time now.

Elise Lucet has already made her self-criticism, she is in the same position in the news, as Professor Raoult is in his “health” sector. She said openly that the treatment of the subjects did not depend only on herself, but on those responsible for the (public?) Channel.

I fully agree on its dependence on those responsible for the chain, even when it hurts bosses of all kinds.
In addition, she is a mother and like all, well a lot, she is concerned about the health of her offspring and therefore her belief in the vaccine miracle, which has been in the habit for so long, that's understandable!
No it's only because this time she put her emotions before her usual reason tapping on vaccine victims and by supporting the poisoners and given the audience of its investigations and the confidence in the probity of the investigators, it sucks!

[Obamot]

(continued) of that: NIH / Fauci / FB Scandal Senate Investigation: Huge!
society-and-philosophy / media-treatment-of-the-covid-crisis-this-is-not-a-bernard-crutzen-plot-t16776-10.html # p475533


———————————————————————————————————
And now...

BMJ open letter to Mark Zuckerberg
Source: https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
"We hope that you will act to correct the error relating to the BMJ article (...) and, in general, to reconsider your investment in fact-checking and your approach to it as a whole. "

———————————————————————————————————
British Medical Journal open letter to Mark Zuckerberg
———————————————————————————————————

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, Editors-in-Chief of BMJ, one of the oldest and most influential general medicine journals in the world. We are writing to express our serious concerns about the "fact checking" being performed by third party vendors on behalf of Facebook / Meta.

In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company that participated in the main trial of the Pfizer covid-19 vaccine, began providing the BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, recordings. audio and emails. These documents revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices within Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also found that, although it received a direct complaint about these issues over a year ago, the FDA has not inspected Ventavia's test sites.

The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write the story for our newspaper. The article was published on November 2, after undergoing legal review, external peer review, and the usual high-level editorial oversight and review by the BMJ [1].

But as of November 10, readers started reporting various issues when they tried to share our article. Some reported that they were unable to share it. Many others reported that their posts were marked with a "missing context" warning. Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people. "People who tried to publish the article were told by Facebook that people who repeatedly share" false information "are at risk of seeing their posts descend into the Facebook news feed. Admins of groups where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that the posts were "partially fake."

Readers were directed to a "fact check" performed by a Facebook subcontractor named Lead Stories [2].

We believe that the "fact-checking" performed by Lead Stories is inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.

- It does not provide any assertion of fact that the BMJ article misinterpreted.

- The headline is absurd: "Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying and Ignored Reports on Defects in Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Trials."

- The first paragraph incorrectly qualifies the BMJ as an "information blog".

- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp saying "Flaws Reviewed", while the Lead Stories article does not identify anything wrong or untrue in the BMJ article.

- He posted the article on his website under a URL that contained the phrase "hoax-alert".

We've reached out to Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their post or the actions that led to Facebook flagging our post.

We have also reached out to Facebook directly, requesting the immediate removal of the "fact-checking" label and any link to the Lead Stories article, allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.

There is also a broader concern that we wish to raise. We recognize that the BMJ is not the only provider of high-quality information that has been affected by the incompetence of Meta's fact-checking regime. To give another example, we highlight the Instagram processing (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high-quality systematic reviews of medical evidence [3]. Rather than investing a portion of Meta's substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared on social media, you have seemingly delegated responsibility to incompetent people to carry out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What happened in this case should be of concern to anyone who appreciates and trusts sources like the BMJ.

We hope you will act quickly: specifically to correct the error relating to the BMJ article and to review the processes that led to this error; and more generally to reconsider your investment and your approach to fact-checking in general.

Best regards,

Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief
Kamran Abbasi, new editor-in-chief
BMJ

Competing interests:
As current and future editors, we are responsible for everything in the BMJ.

References:

[1] Thacker PD. Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial. BMJ. 2021 Nov 2; 375: n2635. doi: 10.1136 / bmj.n2635. PMID: 34728500. https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

[2] Miller D. Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials. Nov 10, 2021. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-british-medical-journal-did-not-reveal-disqualifying-and-ignored-reports-of-flaws -in-pfizer-vaccine-trial.html

[3]


Competing interests: As current and incoming editors in chief, we are responsible for everything The BMJ contains.

[Christophe]

The covid crisis is indeed not a COMPLOT but simply an accumulation of all kinds of lies, frauds and various and varied manipulations with only one common goal: pro vaccination !

It's a Pandemic of Lies but please stop saying that it is a conspiracy because there is nothing of conspiracy in it ... M'enfin!

It is a WHO whistleblower who DARE TO SAY: https://www.anguillesousroche.com/actua ... commandes/

Info relayed by a former SENATOR: https://twitter.com/YvesPDB

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

We don't say "Bill Gates is in charge" we say "Our friend Bill gives us some great advice and lots of big checks." Isn't that true Zombizy?
Here, just for you, we see that the peak of deaths in Romania coincides with the peak of cases and ... vaccination:

Romania.JPG (120.33 KiB) Viewed 957 times

"In Romania, the more we vaccinate, the more we die". CQFD

[ABC2019]

Here, just for you, we see that the peak of deaths in Romania coincides with the peak of cases and ... vaccination:

always so stupid to comment on the stats the puppet ... and without poop gif it shows!

[Christophe]

Except that the statistics (your favorite analysis "tool" especially when they are biased in the provax sense ...) prove Guy, ABCile right!

Ah but you are going to say without vaccination it would have been WORSE? Except that you know STRICTLY NOTHING and that these are only scientific SUPPUTATIONS of bitch of provax!

Now raise your right arm 3 times and shout SIEGVAX loudly !!! Your neighbors have to hear you otherwise it doesn't matter!

ps: Guy, can you repost here? society-and-philosophy / genocide-in-sight-and-depopulation-program-t16997.html

[ABC2019]

Except that the statistics (your "tool" for analyzing predilections especially when they are biased ...) prove Guy, ABCile l

absolutely not, it's completely stupid to compare the number of daily cases to the number of daily vaccinations, there is no expected relationship between these quantities, and Guy never understood the stats nor made a correct calculation: all he can do is post insults and poo gifs, his skills end there.

but I retain the "especially when they are biased ...) prove Guy right,", it's quite funny to say that

[ABC2019]

Ah but you are going to say without vaccination it would have been WORSE? Except you know STRICTLY NOTHING

if you are not able to understand that this kind of graph gives information on the effect of the vaccines, there is nothing more I can do for you. My condolences to your families; I would have tried everything ...

[Christophe]

Is there a DREES * in Romania?

* already caught in the act of siegvax manipulation !!

Yes Goodbye! See you in hell (you'll stay there longer than me ...)