TV Fee

[vincent27]

Hello,

I just found this on a site:

"BE CAREFUL: after becoming a liar (putting France back to work in
100 days), the government becomes a thief!

The housing tax notice now includes, and
as expected, the audiovisual license fee for 2005 (from 1/1
as of 31/12).

The taxman has taken no account of the payments already made to the
"Audiovisual license service" and invoice the license fee for a
whole year, ie 116EUR (large administrative bazaar).

Lots of taxpayers go, if they don't look closely
their latest notice from the "Fee Service"
audiovisual ", pay twice for the same period in 2005.

Example of the last due notice: 116,50EUR for the period of
1/6/2004 au 31/5/2005.

This taxpayer has already paid for the first 5 months of 2005. He
he was however billed 116EUR for the year 2005 for the period
from January 1 to December 31.

It is obviously advisable to claim by providing the parts
supporting documents (copy of the due notice, bank statement ...), hence
postage extra. Given the number of taxpayers that will
manifest it is highly doubtful that the tax center
can respond quickly. You will therefore have to pay while waiting for a
late repayment, if the taxman does not get out by a pirouette
"Your previous validity dates are renewed
(day / month) but billed for the fiscal year ", you must
expect everything!

How many taxpayers (fragile, diminished, etc.) are
not see the error and get ripped off? "

What do you think ?

[Christophe]

I think it's a bit off topic in relation to econology .... the best is 2 anyway to watch TV given the decreasing quality of the programs (follow my look ...) ... except of course ARTE and documentary channels ...

[Superform]

moreover, the answer has already been given by politicians:

in fact, you always pay well from 1/6 to 31/5, but you pay it not at the same time that's all ...