for the list of crookeries:
Well it's been a long time since I think of something like this (it would be valid for many other areas but remain econology). Same spirit as hoaxbuster
For different subjects (water car, econopro, etc) we would have a very succinct thing with the final opinion of some people (moderators for example)
) of style: ++ thinks yes + sees it possible + -: does not know, - does not see it possible - thinks it impossible. o does not have an opinion
We could see the argument with link on the documents of each person by clicking and of course on a return on the forum so that everyone can provide food for thought and check where the conclusions came from
Example
................................ Christophe | xxx. | yyy
Car 100% water .. | .......- -....... | ..- -... | ..- -... | see the debate
Pantone ................. | ++ ....... ...... | ... o ... | ... + ... see the debate
The aldo Costa wheel
Air motor
Econopro, etc ...
and others more controversial, but for those there, we will begin privately destroy Christophe;)
Those who do the negative greanimity would be in a frame of the home page (myths), those who are positive in one (framework realities) and for others, something in debate or other ...
In order to have no problems (diifamation or other), the arguments must be objective on the facts and documents cited and of course highlight the side: "this is only the opinion of x people".
To have the hot topics forward should animate the discussions, set the tone of the site
