The closure of Fessenheim, an ecological fault

[Remundo]

Babeth Bornée is in the category of those who speak AND destroy.

In a word: macronism.

[izentrop]

A political fault with a short-termist electoral aim above all....

[Christophe]

Disagree: the German threat is valid…

[izentrop]

Disagree: the German threat is valid…

What threat? a little noise for a well-managed incident, that's all.

[Christophe]

German lobbying if you prefer…

[izentrop]

German lobbying if you prefer…

Nevertheless, in the eyes of the German Ministry of the Environment, in charge of nuclear safety, France was not guilty of any failure in the management of the incident of April 9. And the classification by the French authorities of the incident in level 1 "was justified", according to Berlin.

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/societe/nuc ... 45063.html
It's just Hollande's promise that absolutely had to be kept in order not to lose face.
A promise that cost France dearly, even long after

Our colleagues from the newspaper L'Alsace reveal the complete fiasco of the Franco-German mixed economy company Novarhéna, created to replace the jobs destroyed by the closure of the infamous nuclear power plant.
“Created in 2021, the Franco-German mixed economy company Novarhéna will be dissolved in October, without having carried out a single project”, notes the local newspaper. “In the absence of projects to carry out, Novarhéna decided to scuttle itself. The Franco-German Sem (…) will meet next month with a single agenda: its dissolution. For the councilor of Alsace (Renaissance) Lara Million, who has chaired Novarhéna for ten months, it is above all a question of stopping the costs, which have already started half of the capital, ”explains the article. The small note still amounts to 500 euros for the taxpayer.

https://www.marianne.net/economie/econo ... tait-bidon

[Janic]

and when the coal mines were closed, that also caused job losses; of the local economy, and yet no one comes to cry misery for a social or cultural catastrophe, much worse than the shutdown of an atomic power plant which is inherently dangerous.

[izentrop]

an atomic power plant that is inherently dangerous.

And yet, the stats show much more mortality from anthrax
Only sees the tip of his nose not pov janic.

[Janic]

05/03/23, 11:42
Janic wrote:

an atomic power plant that is inherently dangerous.

izmentrop

And yet, the stats show much more mortality from anthrax
Only sees the tip of his nose not pov janic.

hey, I thought you weren't watching my speeches so you wouldn't have to answer them. The hypocrite that you are in addition to being a liar

No one-eyed person justifies the blind, including you who can't even see your nose...yet from Pinocchio!
Then don't bring up stats since you stubbornly refuse to check your lies against official vaccine stats.
Finally, the deaths due to coal have been established over more than a century while the deaths from nuclear power are spread and will be spread over many centuries, starting with Hiroshima, Nagasaki, then the successive accidents of the power stations generating cancers and leukemias including Chernobyl and Fukushima and perhaps those that hang in our face!

Nuclear dismantling involves the total and definitive shutdown of operations, the demolition of buildings, as well as - due to the specificities of the radioactive materials used by the nuclear industry - draconian radiation protection measures for people working on the site, containment, packaging and then disposal of radioactive or hazardous waste (for reasons of chemical or radioactive toxicity). In addition to the elements that are directly and normally contaminated, it is also necessary to identify and treat accidental contamination (following splashes, leaks, etc.) and indirect contamination (for example, the neutron fluxes activated the vessel and, to a lesser degree, the internal concrete structures, or the nuclear fuel elements could contaminate the structures of a spent fuel pool).

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9ma ... %C3%A9aire

[Obamot]

German lobbying if you prefer…

Izentrop is French pro-nucleaur lobbying, would there be a conflict of interest?