gfgh64 wrote:Remundo wrote:yes of course, the killing of a fetus because it lacks 4 cents and you have to take tertiary jobs for brainless city dwellers in the middle of the asphalt, it is very "constitutional"
But there is better, we must push the logic further by authorizing a small collective suicide of the couple by invoking the right to no longer suffer. A good idea for the Government.
it's only your vision, it is no more admissible than another, you can express it,
oh how kind you are, I can express my "vision"
but not impose it as absolute truth
I don't present it as such, but my tirade gives food for thought.
Personally, I would not have wanted my partner to abort if she had become pregnant for the fifth time, but I cannot take my example as a reference, I have a lifestyle which has meant that I have always had a lot time to take care of them, and that they never lacked anything. I feel more like a privileged person than anything else
yes because you undoubtedly knew how to organize yourself accordingly.
it's good that you feel concerned about the life of a fetus, besides I have already read to what extent, some are full of compassion towards the little angels
If you are referring to Nahel, a fetus does not refuse to comply for the nth time by compromising the lives of others, without a license in danger at the wheel of a car rented from a crooked rental company.
As for the "brainless city dwellers in the middle of the asphalt", I feel sorry for them and they have my respect, because with their "tertialized jobs"
tertiaRized
they will contribute to my retirement
this must be quite "cons-tipant" of such rigidity of mind
I don't know why you attribute "rigidity of mind" to me, but I have the impression that your ideas are quite stable for your retirement.
I have given a broad and deliberately provocative description of what urban French people have become. They are literally above ground, and that's why they lose their feet (but that's not the only reason).