Tricastin Socatri nuclear accident, uranium leak 360kg?

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 09/07/08, 11:46

it was to see if anyone would react ;-)

if it is filtered in the ground, the external radiation must be measurable?

I believe that in the report we see the criirad, the only independent body in existence, to come forward to take measures to ... protect the public! what a private service! who supports it? ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064




by Christophe » 09/07/08, 11:49

Well I think the question is rather to know not the quantity of uranium in mass but its "dangerousness" ...

It may not be more serious than a depleted uranium ammunition ... what is "good" (for us men) is that it is in the water ... it is "better" "that in the air ...

Am not enough stuck in nuclear to judge ... I let the specialists answer.
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 09/07/08, 11:49

how are they going to water wine and corn?
with bottles of water?

Well, I do not think the vintage 2008 is a success ... who will pay the compensation?

is it a natural disaster? Oh no, it's an artificial disaster! :P
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064




by Christophe » 09/07/08, 11:51

Before speculating, let's wait for the ASN measurements scheduled for tomorrow 10 July ...

As I already said: I have more confidence in the ASN than in the environmental associations ...
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 09/07/08, 11:53

all the radioactivity will eventually arrive somewhere!
how to filter radioactivity? you know ?

I know that mushrooms and lavender are very good at removing particles from the air ... because there is plenty of lavender near the tricastin reactors, it's the region!

the water AND its radioactivity (it has been transformed) are transported, end up well to follow the course ... water, to be drunk by an organism that we will eat (fish, cow that drinks, corn GMO ...), or to be evaporated etc etc!
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 09/07/08, 11:55

in fact a little info distributed 1 week ago, by an INDEPENDENT organization:





CRIIRAD
471 av. Victor Hugo
26000 VALENCE
Tel: +04 75 41 82 50 XNUMX
Fax: +04 75 81 26
E-mail : communication@criirad.org Website: www.criirad.org



NEWS CRIIRAD The 4 July 2008

Scandal with Tricastin: more than 700 tons
radioactive and chemical waste buried in the ground

Ø Find the action launched by the CRIIRAD today, on the occasion of its participation in the meeting of the CIGEET (Information Committee for Large Energy Equipments of Tricastin): click here to access the press release and other infos online.
http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossi ... astin.html

Reports shot by France 2 and France 3 Drôme-Ardèche on the site of Tricastin with Roland DESBORDES, president of CRIIRAD.

The broadcast should take place in tonight's newscasts.

Mining site of the Black Woods (Loire):
sustainable pollution by AREVA

Ø Read the press release and the summary on the website of CRIIRAD



uh I think we do not really care about our mouth there, right?

they declared an accident of flight to better fuck their garbage that they had been holding for years in the fleet!


who is still naive in the room?
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064




by Christophe » 09/07/08, 12:04

Oh yeah not stupid Jonule ... except that between 700 kg and 000 kg there is a "small difference" ....
0 x
the middle
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4075
Registration: 12/01/07, 08:18
x 4




by the middle » 09/07/08, 12:14

O tempora! O mores!
(In what century do we live)
Cicero said it already : Cheesy:
0 x
Floppy28
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 10
Registration: 19/02/08, 22:59
Location: Eure and loir




by Floppy28 » 09/07/08, 12:37

I do not have much confidence anymore! One of these days I would buy my equipment and I would do measurements myself!
I'm sure I'll find a lot of things (well, there's something below the house :x )

It also appears that a TV cathode ray emits X-rays :frown: That's why a lot of people are growing up in front of the TVs! Long live the LCD screens.

For those who want to have fun, pass a calculator lit next to a light bulb consomation ... Our homes are full of traps : Shock:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79374
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11064




by Christophe » 09/07/08, 12:51

Floppy28 wrote:For those who want to have fun, pass a calculator lit next to a light bulb consomation ... Our homes are full of traps : Shock:


Sorry but there is a lot worse than neon bulbs
https://www.econologie.com/ondes-magneti ... -3832.html

But it is true that fluorescent ampoules of shit (ikea) are worse than the recent ones of good and very good quality ...

For the gear you can watch what we have here: Measuring and Diagnostic Devices Energy, Electricity and Environment
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 126 guests