Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by VetusLignum » 26/01/21, 15:56

Christophe wrote:Oh yes sorry :)

Fortunately, the mainstream media are careful to restore the truth ...

https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/202 ... t-_1810854

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/malad ... 59005.html

https://www.rtl.fr/actu/debats-societe/ ... 7800955647

So Carlo Brusa has a lawsuit for defamation in the ass? ... I imagine?


These media do not have any credibility for me, but I do not believe that Peter Daszak would have spoken as he did in early December 2019 if he had known that a new SARS-COV epidemic was emerging. start.
natural-human-disasters / coronavirus-fault-for-who-or-what-and-why-and-why-t16346-1050.html # p428765
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79369
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11062

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Christophe » 26/01/21, 16:18

Didn't you feel my irony? Sorry I forgot the : Mrgreen:
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13721
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1525
Contact :

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by izentrop » 09/02/21, 14:38

Squared Earth Day Topic https://www.franceinter.fr/emissions/la ... vrier-2021

Destruction of the planet and pandemics
1 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12309
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2970

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Ahmed » 09/02/21, 18:43

There, we are right in the subject and what motivated its opening by Sen-no-sen...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79369
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11062

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Christophe » 09/02/21, 18:58

Yes Ahmed but is it really a bad thing?

Man changes nature
Nature modifies man

A little rebalancing of natural selection ... no?
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12309
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2970

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Ahmed » 09/02/21, 19:51

I was not passing judgment, but it corresponds perfectly to my first intervention on this thread where I wrote, I am quoting myself:
The causes are diverse but can be summed up as a desire to destroy the biosphere when we are only in the illusion of mastery of nature. It is normal for forms of rebalancing to be expressed which will be beneficial to non-human living beings against which our proliferation has operated.
1 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by VetusLignum » 09/02/21, 23:18

izentrop wrote:Squared Earth Day Topic https://www.franceinter.fr/emissions/la ... vrier-2021

Destruction of the planet and pandemics


This is the little music that Peter Daszak tries to make heard, to make people forget that the virus probably came out of the WIV, following the research he sponsored.
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opin ... from-67011
0 x
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by VetusLignum » 18/02/21, 00:50

VetusLignum wrote:In an interview dated 09/12/2019, Peter Daszak tells us about the work in progress at the WIV, they tell us that more than 100 new SARS-COVs have been discovered, that some of them are capable of infecting the human, or cause SARS in "humanized mouse models", and they have no treatment or vaccine.

He adds that there was GOF work underway to develop a vaccine against these viruses.



A hypothesis which can be deduced from this video:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1354 ... 73705.html

A first article on the troubled role of Peter Daszak:
https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/13/worl ... ronavirus/

New USRTK reveal: Ralph Baric was part of the plot
https://usrtk.org/biohazards-blog/no-ne ... ent-ralph/


Reminder: Ralph Baric is also at the origin of Remdesivir:
https://sph.unc.edu/sph-news/remdesivir ... al-trials/

Some other good articles:
https://www.independentsciencenews.org/ ... mic-virus/
https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03910
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/8691
https://archive.is/cBU5W
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14973
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4370

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 18/02/21, 16:03

It's all well and good, but it has no proof value.
Hypotheses:
1: Human manipulation can be detected by sequencing the virus genome. The IHU Marseille is specialized in sequencing.
1.1: They did not detect any such thing at the IHU. No bogus.
1.2: They updated human manipulation but say nothing about it. Hidden bunkering. It would be extremely serious.

2: We cannot detect human manipulations in an RNA sequence and we only have indicative beams left, as VetusLignum compiles them since the start of the pandemic, convinced that there is manipulation.
2.1: We embroider, we embroider, we fantasize, we extrapolate, we denounce plots.

What I think: 1 + 1.1
But of course I could be wrong.
0 x
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by VetusLignum » 18/02/21, 16:18

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:It's all well and good, but it has no proof value.
Hypotheses:
1: Human manipulation can be detected by sequencing the virus genome. The IHU Marseille is specialized in sequencing.
1.1: They did not detect any such thing at the IHU. No bogus.
1.2: They updated human manipulation but say nothing about it. Hidden bunkering. It would be extremely serious.

No, we can't necessarily detect it. Even Ralph Baric recognized it.
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:2: We cannot detect human manipulations in an RNA sequence and we only have indicative beams left, as VetusLignum compiles them since the start of the pandemic, convinced that there is manipulation.
2.1: We embroider, we embroider, we fantasize, we extrapolate, we denounce plots.

No, we're accumulating evidence.
What is almost certain is that the virus came out of the WIV. Then, was it a natural virus, or a virus transformed in the laboratory? We don't know yet.
0 x

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 130 guests