Article on Rue89 dismantle the theory of 11 / 09

[gegyx]

It is extraordinary, we can go retrieve black boxes several months later, in the depths of the ocean, and officially it has not recovered the black boxes 4 aircraft towers (2x2).

Yet rescuers would have seen recover 3 ...

She would have been so interesting!
The flight paths, which even experienced pilots say can not accomplish.
To know if the orders were in manual, in automatic, or abnormally ordered elsewhere ...

And the conversations of the pilots? Super interesting!
Let's see: Kamikases pilots rereading the notes of the last courses of a tourist plane, while focusing on tight turns, trying not to miss the goal at 800km / h ...
Ah, I forgot: at the same time, prayers and incantations to recommend his soul to God ...

**
The black box (conversations) "found" in the Pentagon was unfortunately disemboweled and unusable.
It's out of luck, while it should be almost indestructible (titanium) ... It's also true, it did not seem at all consistent, to the norm.
The other flight plan, had to be hidden in a flowerpot, behind a printer, because it was "found" 3 days after ... But with a file created on the date of 13 seven ...
It's stupid!

http://www.reopen911.info/News/2008/05/ ... septembre/

[Christophe]

Ah yes no black boxes but we found a Saudi passport ... from the 1er or 2ieme day!

Obviously ...

To find them would have had no interest: they would surely have confirmed the opinions heard here:

The opinion of some (old) pilots: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xl3rpg ... embre_tech

Have we found those 2 other flights?

[Christophe]

It's not a parano report from the web:

Hello

two videos

http://lefinancier.ca/?p=653

Andre

Direct links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQgu5Xwpclo et http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUa2GRosGzk

1ere part of 9: 15 we hear "Important Laws cannot be made in the public place"...

It's good to admit it but then you have to revise the definition of democracy or republic ...

[Janic]

It's good to admit it but then you have to revise the definition of democracy or republic ...

How is democracy ... and republican in addition?

[Christophe]

Well, I do not know too much ...

A country where important laws would be decided ... uh by referendum ...

A country where senators, deputies and other government actors would be incorruptible and swore an oath to the constitution and the people in public ...

A country where lobbying would not exist ...

We can dream...

You know?

[Christophe]

France3 evokes the case of WTC7 on the occasion of the 10th "anniversary": http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xkz23g ... -wtc7_news

Listen to the last seconds ...

[Flytox]

A country where important laws would be decided ... uh by referendum ...

By people competent et not financially interested by the implications (when possible).

A country where senators, deputies and other government actors would be incorruptible and swore an oath to the constitution and the people in public ...

A country or the representatives of the state would be drawn (as at the origin of democracy) in a big list of competent people varied horizons, whose incomes would be controlled and controllable (before during and after taking office) and comparable to those of the average French, but these representatives of the state would not be elected (corruptible and therefore corrupt).

These representatives of the state would be accountable for all their activity, and no kind of immunity when they made all sorts of crap using their power (abuse of social good, insider trading, passive, active, embezzlement of public funds, influence traffic etc ...).

A country where lobbying would not exist ...

A country where lobbying would be severely punished by law and in fact as criminal acts.

A country where all past rogue laws (self-amnesty and others) could be repealed in a real concern for equality, freedom, fraternity, sauerkraut. This on request from citizens or citizens' associations.

A country or all banking activity would be controlled at 100% by the state.

A country where currency control would belong to 100% in the state.

We can dream...

Yesssssssss ......

[Obamot]

Direct links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQgu5Xwpclo et http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUa2GRosGzk

1ere part of 9: 15 we hear "Important Laws cannot be made in the public place"...

It's good to admit it but then you have to revise the definition of democracy or republic ...

Here we are, in many countries, to reach the government, it is necessary to show paw (and even for several generations ...). No salvation without co-optation!

And democracy in all this? A wishful vow. The "basic" citizen is judged with incredible contempt, inccapable that he would be able to "understandWhat's going on behind the scenes.

What's happening? This is precisely what we would like to know, no?

It is understandable that there are precautions in a democratic state. But why not announce clearly the color and redefine the rules that apply to secrecy and address without taboos the subjects concerned. Because for the moment, it seems a bit too fastoche ...

[Obamot]

So, since we're talking about TABOU, let's get back to our sheep: the causes of 9 / 11.

In the thread of 100 pages, it had been said that the last six months before 9 / 11, the Hebrew state [known for one of the leading figures of military technology] was placed at the foot of the wall, with regard to to recognize the merits of the Palestinian demands and urged on the part of the international community to stop the "ethnic cleansing of the settlements" in the occupied territories.

Then eight years later, Obama arrived with his slogan: "Yes we canWhich will propel him President.

But what did he say then:

Obama, still a senator, delivers 4 June 2008 a speech at AIPAC (Amercian-Israel Policy Conference) where he says: "As President, I will help Israel achieve the goal of two States - a Jewish State of Israel and a Palestinian State living side by side in peace and security and I will not wait for the end of my term. I will play an active role and make a personal commitment to do all I can to advance the cause of peace from the beginning of my term "

"Now, let me be clear, Israel's security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable, the Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and coherent and that allows them to prosper, but any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve the identity of Israel as a Jewish state with secure borders, recognized, defensible. "

[...]

A year later, in Cairo, the 3 June 2009, Obama delivers the speech "A new beginning": "the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. America will not turn its back on the legitimate aspiration of the Palestinian people for dignity ... and their own state "

"The United States does not accept the legitimacy of the pursuit of Israeli settlements. These constructions violate previous agreements and undermine efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop. "

"The only resolution is for the aspirations of both parties to be met by two states, where Israelis and Palestinians will each live in peace and security".

http://bettencourtlarbrequicacheraitlaf ... tine1.html

And two years later? The Palestinians - not born of the last rain - took the American President literally, by formally filing an application for membership. What is more, by the voice of the head of the Palestinian Authority, surprisingly soft until then: Mahmoud Abbas. Finally a subtle and very smart (as soon as the request is made, it does not risk much ...)!

So what? The United States is probably the height of hypocrisy after cooling down Ben Ladden, because they are ready to use their right of veto to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state, which they pretended to call their own. wishes until then!

Is not that clear enough?

[dedeleco]

An experimental study of the effects of molten aluminum with different products and effects on steel beams;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

it seems hard to believe that aluminum aircraft could have made spontaneously on both towers repeatedly, which they have a lot of trouble to achieve in these experiments ??

The WTC7 did not have a lot of molten aluminum aircraft.

It is certain that one must make real experiments, as on this video, by adding molten aluminum with water to see the spontaneous effects ???

The aluminum of the planes was certainly strongly dispersed ???