Prof, do you have any information on the variability in the composition of LPG and, by extension, if it can have a significant influence on pollutant emissions?
For my part, the only variation I could see is the propane / butane ratio, which can vary from country to country.
Are there any standards for setting this ratio to a "national" distribution level?
GPL: latest news
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
- professeur31
- Pantone engine Researcher
- posts: 113
- Registration: 20/12/04, 20:28
Woodcutter wrote:Prof, do you have any information on the variability in the composition of LPG and, by extension, if it can have a significant influence on pollutant emissions?
For my part, the only variation I could see is the propane / butane ratio, which can vary from country to country.
Are there any standards for setting this ratio to a "national" distribution level?
I will see what I can find as information and I will communicate it if I find it.
For having carried out tests and measurements in pure butane then in pure propane and finally in LPG, I think that the influence of the ratio is negligible because I did not see any significant difference concerning the pollutants emitted in the 3 cases.
For the standards, I will check because I know that this ratio is well defined; this does not necessarily imply normalization.
Your question is very interesting from the technical point of view, I take care of it.
a ++
0 x
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
- professeur31
- Pantone engine Researcher
- posts: 113
- Registration: 20/12/04, 20:28
Woodcutter wrote:Well, I found that: FAQ Primagaz.
Apparently in France, it's 50 / 50.
Mashed + faster than me the lumberjack !!
Effectively, I just found it is 50 / 50.
Go to a little woods school:
Do you know the additional fuel consumption factor in LPG compared to gasoline?
It will not please our friend paedolien
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
0 x
- professeur31
- Pantone engine Researcher
- posts: 113
- Registration: 20/12/04, 20:28
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
Oue but the PCI is expressed en masse while the conso is expressed in liters, that's where it stuck ...Professor31 wrote:I am helping you:
conso factor sup = Gasoline PCI: PCI GPL.
That's where it hurts !!!!
hihihihihi.
The density of LPG is about 0,55 I think, right?
By cons I have not found anything on the standard EN589 ... I do not know if on Legifrance or sites like that we can find information of this type ...
0 x
- professeur31
- Pantone engine Researcher
- posts: 113
- Registration: 20/12/04, 20:28
Woodcutter wrote:Oue but the PCI is expressed en masse while the conso is expressed in liters, that's where it stuck ...Professor31 wrote:I am helping you:
conso factor sup = Gasoline PCI: PCI GPL.
That's where it hurts !!!!
hihihihihi.
The density of LPG is about 0,55 I think, right?
By cons I have not found anything on the standard EN589 ... I do not know if on Legifrance or sites like that we can find information of this type ...
ok then we will take the combustion values in MJ / l
for gasoline it is 32.7 and for GPL 25.1.
so 32.7 / 25.1 = 1.30 !!! it is really that in reality, I found it !!!
In reality the overhead of conso is between 23 and 30% compared to gasoline and this is a function of the settings.
For the EN589, I have nothing, I will continue to search.
Petrol density = 0.750 and GPL = 0.546.
0 x
MOUAIS ...
I do not quite agree with this simplistic approach;
PCS, MJ / L, Density ...
In fact it is necessary to synthesize all the characteristics of 2 fuels.
I did (some time ago) a work of comparison between the different fuels.
The density: 0.555 kg / l of lpg and 0.75kg / l of sp95 does not have much interest (except when I fill my bottles of butane with lpg, to check that the pump does not rob me ) I weigh my gas and I check that the volume in liter corresponds to its weight.
The PCS alone is not explicit, it is rather PCS / PCI report
MJ / l or Kwh / l are not exact refflets for performance differences between 2 fuels.
The actual difference is closer to 20% than 30% announced above!
Indeed, the rate of combustion, the speed of the flame front and many other parameters such as the ability to form a gaseous mixture (air / fuel) homogeneous ...
In general, it is easier to have "complete" lpg combustion than for gasoline which is characterized by high levels of unburned hydrocarbons (% HC). oil of gasoline cars (on a lpg the oil remains clean) as well as the exhausts.
All these beautiful figures are obtained in test tubes of the lab, on engines in operation, it is a very different affair ...
I do not quite agree with this simplistic approach;
PCS, MJ / L, Density ...
In fact it is necessary to synthesize all the characteristics of 2 fuels.
I did (some time ago) a work of comparison between the different fuels.
The density: 0.555 kg / l of lpg and 0.75kg / l of sp95 does not have much interest (except when I fill my bottles of butane with lpg, to check that the pump does not rob me ) I weigh my gas and I check that the volume in liter corresponds to its weight.
The PCS alone is not explicit, it is rather PCS / PCI report
MJ / l or Kwh / l are not exact refflets for performance differences between 2 fuels.
The actual difference is closer to 20% than 30% announced above!
Indeed, the rate of combustion, the speed of the flame front and many other parameters such as the ability to form a gaseous mixture (air / fuel) homogeneous ...
In general, it is easier to have "complete" lpg combustion than for gasoline which is characterized by high levels of unburned hydrocarbons (% HC). oil of gasoline cars (on a lpg the oil remains clean) as well as the exhausts.
All these beautiful figures are obtained in test tubes of the lab, on engines in operation, it is a very different affair ...
0 x
In Bucheron theory, if you want to find the norms, you have to get out of your wallet, because a norm is bought.
Bucheron, I'm intelectually limited, but I'm not wasting my time looking for a standard, intellectually, I know you have to buy it. And as financially, I am limited ...
well, I do not know what a fuel is made of, mouhahahahaha
Note, it would serve me nothing, I could intelligently not understand the composition being intelectuellement limited.
What I like the irony with you, Bucheron, you are a perfect toy, in addition, you make spell check, better than google !!!
Bucheron, I'm intelectually limited, but I'm not wasting my time looking for a standard, intellectually, I know you have to buy it. And as financially, I am limited ...
well, I do not know what a fuel is made of, mouhahahahaha
Note, it would serve me nothing, I could intelligently not understand the composition being intelectuellement limited.
What I like the irony with you, Bucheron, you are a perfect toy, in addition, you make spell check, better than google !!!
0 x
But what I love above all Bucheron, and it is also valid for Professor, is that suddenly, you start to ask questions that you did not ask before.
Gender "Does the composition of a fuel directly affect its combustion, on emissions of pollution?"
I think it's a good question to start a serious study. no?
(limited intelectually, eh Bucheron!)
Here, I allow myself to make an affirmation. there are LPGs, diesels, and species that pollute less than others.
But behind that, by reasoning like a bell, mouahahaha, I ask myself questions, where do the fuels that pollute the least, or the most, come from?
And which process is best able to provide a less polluting or smoother fuel?
And also, what is the most stable process in production series?
grrr c relou the quality !!!
Gender "Does the composition of a fuel directly affect its combustion, on emissions of pollution?"
I think it's a good question to start a serious study. no?
(limited intelectually, eh Bucheron!)
Here, I allow myself to make an affirmation. there are LPGs, diesels, and species that pollute less than others.
But behind that, by reasoning like a bell, mouahahaha, I ask myself questions, where do the fuels that pollute the least, or the most, come from?
And which process is best able to provide a less polluting or smoother fuel?
And also, what is the most stable process in production series?
grrr c relou the quality !!!
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 1 Replies
- 4253 views
-
Last message by Did67
View the latest post
12/12/15, 14:48A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 49 Replies
- 30943 views
-
Last message by I Citro
View the latest post
15/07/09, 07:54A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 19 Replies
- 9804 views
-
Last message by I Citro
View the latest post
05/10/08, 10:22A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 13 Replies
- 9740 views
-
Last message by Woodcutter
View the latest post
01/06/08, 00:49A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
-
- 8 Replies
- 4886 views
-
Last message by le_courtois
View the latest post
04/06/07, 23:08A subject posted in the forum : New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ...
Back to "New transport: innovations, engines, pollution, technologies, policies, organization ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 168 guests