Nikola Tesla's excess energy? (Christophe Tetard)

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Be careful with your mouth, it's the elite, Blédina!

[humus]

there is not the slightest fact to support these rants.

Some self-promotional videos from the author.

[humus]

The nozzle ... and even the nozzles, sorry gentlemen.
Active power: 40W eff input, 7 Weff output, I have more! pitiful
A little more reactive power at the output than at the input, 7%, magnificent! apart from the measurement tolerances, nothing can be concluded.
And anyway there would be 10 times more reactive power at the output than at the input than that wouldn't change a thing, which is useful is the active power.

[Obamot]

Be careful with your mouth, it's the elite, Blédina!

He advances in small pots ... ( )

[Exnihiloest]

Well, here it has just been released !!!!! If anyone understands well let him know:

I have followed the Kapanadze affair from the start (it's been quite a few years already). No one has managed to duplicate anything from their system (I even wonder how their patents were accepted, there are undescribed black boxes everywhere). I even had fun duplicating the "Kapagen", which was a version revisited by JL Naudin. Not the slightest effect could suggest a departure from conventional physics.
But for years incompetent people have been talking about it and claiming to explain its principles and secrets to you as if they were specialists in a technology that works (Wesley on overunity.com) and some produce pseudo-replications by promoting on youtube (Akula).
Of course, no serious experimentalist, amateur or professional electronics engineer or engineer will ever confirm their assemblies by producing a well reproducible engineering diagram.
These charlatans then acquire notoriety, sell books, or are paid for presentations at conferences on "free energy". As for the pseudo-inventors, they solicit investors and even make them pay for the visit of their machine. This "free energy" movement started on the Internet in the 1990s, and has never produced anything real since.
Scientifically, Kapanadze, it absolutely does not hold water. There isn't even the slightest original idea that could make us think that Maxwell's electromagnetism could be faulted. Everything is hyper-conventional, only the claim of obtaining free energy is not, but unfortunately, there is not the slightest fact to support these ramblings.

There is not the slightest scientific argument in this "pavement"

The scientific argument is well known to everyone except fools:
energy conservation.

[Obamot]

No that's not it, if you write

I have followed the Kapanadze affair from the start (it's been quite a few years already).

So you have covered the problem to its essence, But where are your scientific arguments? To say:

- “ energy conservation" (or not)

This is not a scientific explanation.
Merci ....

And it's "an idiot”Who understood it and pointed it out to you

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

And for the preservation of his person in advanced decomposition, how does he do it?

[Obamot]

Blédina? We don't know, for the moment he is advancing in small pots

808AF71A-A9F5-4EF3-B8C1-258D99B327FB.jpeg (40.93 Kio) Consulté 1231 fois

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

It is true that it is under vacuum ...

[petitbreton]

There is the bouquet !!!!!!!!!