JLS wrote:Have there not been to your knowledge plans of experience likely to objectively enlighten the funky DIYers who randomly compile a multitude of parameters crossed on a "unique" montage.
Sorry, but I did not find much of a very scientific analysis of the results while some of them are "stunning" in terms of performance and worthy of being studied more finely.
I work in BE on "proto" machines where tests are often necessary. It is not forbidden to believe in its good star, but by experience, the factor "luck" although not negligible should not overshadow the need for analysis.
I have trouble today to "build" a project based on what I could glean in experiments "Pantone"
Good evening
myself, I do not know in which direction to glean the best tricks, iron, stainless steel, nickel, bubbler, booster heated by the coolant.
There are probably systems that work, still need to test them when they walk, since apparently it does not work all the time
The meager tests I was able to do worry me a lot
I used them on systems that normally gave very good results in the economy generated, the equipment used for these systems, we had nothing to complain about (stainless steel bubbler, reactor supplied by spad), many ex. in photos on the site chtipantone (vulcano)
The very good results announced were by the owners of the tested tractors: the FIAT 110-90 which is mentioned in the press review, and the 2eme which here are the results of the test bench:
Yet I had thought carefully to conduct the test protocol to ensure to highlight when and under what conditions the pantone worked: full load tests, different partial loads, and empty
Comments are welcome
But in your place, I will still take a step back from all those who announce results very enviable
Do like me: go check on site
bolt