zorglub wrote:Tell us how you got the info that would not surprise me if it was via an email
sources:
the world, the figaro
but nothing received by mail
that's what we find on google about led
What we would like to know are the doctors who took part in this (if any, there was, worthy of the name) as well as clinical studies.
When we see what incapacities is constituted the National Agency for Food Safety, the Environment and Labor is no longer surprised at anything. If we list the devitalised foods they do not say anything about and the worse things they sell:
- carcinogenic additives prohibited elsewhere ...
- margarine with hydrogenated grease do you want it here ...
- edible oils cut with waste oil (c / o Lesieur who had bought adulterated stock to cut them and put them on sale) ah but they would say to me, it was not illegal ... it was in the "tolerances" .... But they did not ask the consumers if they were okay with putting in their salads ...
But we can do without studies.
Everyone knows that kids have a holy horror of doing things that hurt them. So long fix a source of intense light such as the sun, they know it's not done! I do not see why they would fix LEDs? It's absurd! At worst just call them to order, but everyone knows that!
On the other hand, for those who need a very high quality lighting, these are all indicated, while the incandescent or compact fluorescent lamps left you an approximate halo, the LEDs make you re-run of what you you enlighten with. Try with ads with photos and text printed in offset: examine in detail and compare the quality of colors, their neutrality, contours, the raster, the effect 3D ... It is without comment! LEDs are winning all the way with the added bonus that they do not tire you anymore.
As for surprise that they have invaded supermarkets, excuse me but it's a bit normal since those incandescent have been banned for sale ...
