Concerning the idea of the oppressive nature of economic-transitional ecologism*, two attitudes should be avoided: if one experiences genuine ecological inclinations, take them for what they claim to be, or take offense if the we remain a stainless capitalist at heart. This is just another mutation of capitalism, certainly with destructive aspects, but in a less dramatic way than a war, even if it is "good", and crying out for the tyranny of the "Green Khmer" in the name that of the market, is hardly sustainable, neither in principle nor in reality, since it is only the new posture of the latter...
* Have you ever had that one done before, expression? Admit!
