Yes, but to size it for the couple, it is necessary to relax the sails, which are only productive during a small part of the cycle (roughly, from downwind to downwind)
It is therefore essential that it rotates slowly because in dynamics they break.
To size it for the speed, it is necessary to border the sails; in static they are productive only from close to small drop, but in dynamics the relative wind makes it possible to increase the range of effectiveness.
(principle of the Darrieus wind turbine, which gives almost no torque in static)
So in one case we have a wind turbine whose torque decreases with speed; in the other he grows to a maximum and then decreases
I think the second is better
But if the sails are controllable, it can adapt exactly like a boat: sails hollow and not too bordered by weak wind, for optimal torque and low speed;
and sails flat and lined at the bottom in high wind, with a high speed of rotation.
The key is to determine which profile is best suited to each wind speed (and each rotation speed of the wind turbine)
Last year at school we did this kind of study for a Darrieus rigid-wing wind turbine. This requires having the Cz and Cx values of the blades as a function of the incidence. With a NACA profile it was not a problem; for triangular sails it may be a little harder to determine ...
)
