Opale2sang wrote:Bonjour.
I have no classic, besides that doesn't mean anything, each one is the fruit of his experience, and you seem to forget it, my way of thinking is simple
I haven't forgotten anything at all, and your way of thinking is not simple but simplistic. Obviously everyone feels the music according to their experience, it's trivial!
You gave your feelings, I gave mine. I would not have the right not to have the same? Do you think you are at the center of the world and your navel the benchmark?
"It means nothing"It's only because you are missing marbles, no need to get on your high horse." Revise your classics "is a simple expression. "Classics are quite simply cultural references shared by a large number of people.like the actor Stan Laurel you were talking about. In this case, it was about revising the classics of cinema. You confuse Charlie Chaplin we see at minute 2:50 and Stan Laurel. It gets over you when someone says it to you and you hit the nail on the head. Cool !
It seems you didn't understand ...
the system in place only bets on the dough ...
this youth that you do not understand ...
A word to everyone, hi.
Your 2-ball lessons are completely decorrelated from the subject, no need to repeat the clichés of the conditioning from which you take them.
For your info, following your learned "note the passage from Stan Laurel which says a lot", no chance
it's Charlie Chaplin:Charlie Chaplin
Stan Laurel
Everyone gets it wrong, you better make amends, and thank me for reporting your blunder.
When you have gained a little in culture, civility and intelligence of situations, come back and give us lessons. Thank you in advance.
