eclectron wrote: The birth rate drops with standard of living and education.
Do you mean the birth rate drops with the increase in the standard of living and education?
eclectron wrote: The birth rate drops with standard of living and education.
in the context of a sober and efficient development ... That too is utopia
pedrodelavega wrote:eclectron wrote: The birth rate drops with standard of living and education.
Do you mean the birth rate drops with the increase in the standard of living and education?
Oil is much more convenient to mine and use than coal.
It's the intelligence of the use we make of energy that is the problem.
Ahmed wrote:Certainly! In first analysis you are right,
Janic, you write:as part of a sober and efficient development ...
That's also utopia
Anything that does not exist can be accused of utopia, in this case it is the only realistic option, although unlikely ...
is to be put in relation with the determinisms that animate us and not a lack of wisdom or consciousness, moral categories completely inadequate as explanatory factors.
The birth rate drops with the increase of the standard of living and the birth rate decreases with the increase of the level of education, to be more precise
it is a hard fact, there is nothing to add ...
Of course we can continue to take Man for an irresponsible being and consider that putting him in the hands of the power of abundant energy, makes him a destructive being.
And therefore, in order to avoid destruction, you have to turn off the energy tap.
You forget the cave and the candle, in your anthology!It's a step backwards (yes, you are several and not just a little! ) preach: 1850, horse, paddlewheel ... solar bonus.
eclectron wrote:sen-no-sen wrote:It is important to repeat, and to repeat again that it is too full of energy, and not are lack that constitutes a danger for the biosphere, and not the opposite !!!
Absolutely not, and it's important to repeat it and repeat it!
It's the intelligence of the use we make of energy that is the problem.
In fact it is rather the lack of intelligence of our actions and the ignorance of their consequences which is problematic.
This is a problem of education and awareness of our actions.
The abundance of energy (clean) is not a problem in itself, on the contrary would be rather a problem in less.
Ahmed wrote:Eclectron,you write:it is a hard fact, there is nothing to add ...
A fact does not mean anything in itself, it must necessarily be placed in its context and we must explain how it is significant or not. Fans of "pragmatism" are only supporters of conservatism ...
Ahmed wrote:Where do you get this deduction?
Ahmed wrote:.. I am convinced that only a lucid desire to resist determinism represents the right way out
Ahmed wrote:
Where do you get this deduction?
hence: ".. I am convinced that only a lucid will to resist determinism represents the right way out."
Go back to "The bistro: site life, leisure and relaxation, humor and conviviality and Classifieds"
Users browsing this forum : A.D. 44 and 133 guests