Did67 wrote:Is a brain grafted? I envy its 5 stars too!
As long as it's not her fake boobs, it's fine ...
Did67 wrote:Is a brain grafted? I envy its 5 stars too!
Did67 wrote:Will I know if I'm not ready for anything to sell ??? Make the dredge-queen in the PP, well, a concept!
Product details
Paperback: 368 pages
Christophe wrote:But I think I understand that it will be much more illustrated than the other 2?
Christophe wrote: ... and to bounce back on the last 2 negative comments that you had Didier ... don't forget that people are running out of time: they are too many on youtube and facebook!
Christophe wrote:Well I already said it above and as of the publication and reading of the first version of the book: simplifying the editorial approach would make the technique much more democratic and would reach many more people ... children and teenagers for example ...
Because it must be said that there is a sacred paradox: having to read nearly 400 pages for lazy people is already a sacred effort!
The world 2020 is in a hurry, it is necessary immediately *: 400 pages puts off a good number of gardener ... a guide of 50 to 100 illustrated pages would be an approach which would allow to reach a wider audience ... schools by example, you were in teaching Didier, you must understand what I mean!
Did67 wrote:Ah, I had not seen !!!
So a quick point:
a) Yes, it is illustrated with about 500 or 600 photos (I worked with a photographer friend; he was the one who kept the count, made some of the photos - another part is mine, took them all "processed" ...).
b) But it is still significantly longer than the other - in terms of "signs", roughly double !.
Did67 wrote:C) And that, because I can't write anything else !!!
I can only do one thing: explain mechanisms. Say "do this, like that!" is something that strikes me deep inside. Who would I be to tell you what you must do, in your situation, according to your desires ??? I have nothing to order you. I can give you, offer, lend (or as regards the book, sell not too expensive!) A certain number of knowledge, observations, conclusions to which I arrived (at the moment t). You will take what interests you ....
Did67 wrote:To please is not an objective. Well, not mine ... I prefer to bring something to 10 people rather than being read and believed bigotly (and stupidly) by 1. An ethical choice. Clearly: I have neither the ambition to die famous, nor the desire to die rich! It seems to me that I will not digest my death well!
Did67 wrote:My goal: to explain, to open my eyes, to release shackles, fashions, unique thoughts, "we've always done it like that ...", "I've been told that this works ..." (read the subtitle well, it sums up my state of mind).
Did67 wrote:I had to face pressure from my editor but am delighted to have found the support of mine (who took a considerable risk to accompany me on this path) ...
Did67 wrote:Here in summary. Of course, I hope that there will be enough intelligent, curious people to have at least a success of esteem (and not that my editor takes the hot water!).
Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 166 guests