How effective the logs of paper?

[zac]

I don't see how to do this without electricity.

Hello

with a piece of paper and a match

@+

[jonule]

Hello !
the pellet stove:
it is flammable wood gas with a primary air, and especially a secondary air which burns this wood gas instead of letting it fly outside, like a chimney for example ...
wood gas ?! that's it :
http://www.nrjrealiste.fr/poele/poele2.html
on this site the incoming air is not regulated: everything burns in no time, however the flame is impressive.

So to adjust the power, you have to regulate the incoming air ... depending on the outgoing air, there is an oxygen / pollution type sensor!
like an oil stove, yes you need incoming air ... electrically!

otherwise yes we could do it by hand, by adjusting a small shutter!
but good at the time of electronics ...
but it must work on battery + converter I think, for isolated sites ...

-------------------------------------------------- ----

if not for the paper bricks (ah what could I do with it as a kid! say they rotted outside ...): make bricks for construction!
we call it the paper binder!
and yes in luxury papers there is clay ...

and that at least is recycling, it allows not to use concrete block so a LOT less CO2; I think you know that the construction of concrete blocks is an attack on the ecology ...

[I Citro]

I don't see how to do this without electricity.

Hello

with a piece of paper and a match

@+

Aaaaaaaaaaaaah !!! Not stupid that !!!

[iota]

Hello jonule

I went to see on the site but I did not understand the principle.
The wood is heated and therefore produces vapors.
It's ok!
But it takes energy to heat this wood, if we use the wood directly and we burn it it amounts to the same ?!
or is it self maintained ?!

[Woodcutter]

[...] I do not see how the shit burnt that could not be toxic.

And then because YOU do not do not see, that should be toxic?
Are u ankles Fine ?


To keep a minimum of credibility, you better try to find some arguments that would show a potential toxicity of burning excrement instead of coming out of nonsense like that ...

[renaud67]

During the war (39/45), my mother told me that she recovered horse droppings to burn them (but droppings are certainly less toxic than human excrement )

[Woodcutter]

But why do you absolutely want excrement (in the sense of feces) are toxic?

[Christophe]

wood gas ?! that's it :
http://www.nrjrealiste.fr/poele/poele2.html
on this site the incoming air is not regulated: everything burns in no time, on the other hand the flame is impressive ...

I find your experience very interesting! Bravo Jonule! (for once we are on the same wavelength )

[Christophe]

But why do you absolutely want excrement (in the sense of feces) are toxic?

Maybe because ... does it stink?

[Charlotte]

Hello, Earth?

What is "toxic" in feces is our own enteric bacteria, the ones that live in our gut and help us digest. As soon as it is out, it is necessary to avoid contact with food and drinking water (hence the invention of the latrines), under penalty of overdosing on bacteria and having a nasty current.

Burning excrement is not toxic, the beefiest bacteria rarely resist the temperatures of chimney fires, and those that would certainly do not live in our intestines, much too cold for them. And as far as I know there are no toxic molecules in the stool, except when you have been intoxicated yourself, of course.

Horse dung and cow dung seem to me more suitable than carnivore faeces in general (including human), because of their composition. Are you ok, do you want the details too?