Mwoui, there's quite a bit of stuff in this documentary show, since basically what bothers me the most is that it's VERY "oriented".
I explain myself, almost every time the commentator (who we do not know who it is, nor that they are his skills, any more than are mysterious interlocutor ... (which she would eventually reveal the identity by discreet contact ... lol) it's all very esoteric and occult science, menfinbref ....)
I noted (in the line of an attempt thesis / antithesis quickly abandoned we will see why lower) some points:
1) It is not only the Egyptians who have carved and moved large blocks of stone, there are also in Lebanon, Syria ... And even on Christian sites! There is an example in Lebanon in a career where there are blocks whose cutting had been started but not finished to this day (I still have slides of our first study trip there, in the 70 years. Yes it's a feat, but it was done at that time ... It says in the film, there is an aspect of devotion to surpass humans and their very condition ...
2) 900 km by boat for 130 granite slabs, you just need the loading / unloading method and the boat "which is fine", the beech has a compressive strength of 500 Kg / cm2 (!!!) therefore of 12 to 70 tons, where is the problem that's more than 6 tons per inch, 100 tons for a section of beam of 10 cm X 10 cm ... they knew the resistance of the materials and knew very well how far they could go too far...
For 70 meters high (and more), Dassault Aviation - at the request of Egyptologists - had made a modeling to demonstrate that it was possible and how they could achieve it, by entering all the parameters of the resistances of the materials. Moreover, the challenges they have achieved can be explained by the socio-cultural issues (religion) of this society and their devotion ... There are still signs of it in Asia, even today.
3) For accuracy, all they had to do was use optical means and refer to the sun, or even aim at night, thanks to the stars. We then obtain extraordinary precision with a very simplified ad hoc sighting system (the Egyptians were also astronomers). There is no doubt that these precision tools found a "technical" use after the end of the era of the pharaohs. Probably the reason why they disappeared (?)
4) We already knew that they adjusted "by hand" each block to its place of final destination. It's not a scoop. The precision of the tenth of a mm has long been debated, there are several explanations, in particular by using the mass represented by the intrinsic weight of the blocks, and making it an asset, rather than seeing it as a handicap. We also knew that they were doing specific jobs (but not only they were capable of it). To say that it would be "strange" because it would have withstood earthquakes, is not. the rock withstands compressive forces extremely well, there is almost no shearing force in the pyramids (or on small spans, as we see in the film), the blos therefore supporting each other .
5) The precise orientation of the pyramids is also a feat, but they had / these tools of aiming, which in principle created the astronomers to reach to establish their celestial plans. And in their perspectives of the order of metaphysics, it was imperative for them to have a perfect orientation / alignment.
6) The next feat is without comment. There is no particularly difficult difficulty than other challenges they have succeeded.
7) «
According to the majority of Egyptologists», Hum ... it does not mean anything! Since, on the other hand, it is said that they contradict each other ... 20 years to build the pyramids seems to me a little. I do not remember hearing that! To be convinced of this, it is enough to see that the construction of the pyramids was nothing but an industry (to see their number):
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramide_d%27Égypte
So the number of blocks extracted from quarries was not a criterion of impossibility.
The report leads us to think of a number of false things, such as the fact that they had only two tools to build the pyramids. The commentary at the beginning and even oppressive in this sense. And of course it's wrong, because they had a MULTITUDE of very different tools, they do not even talk about the logs used to pull the blocks (laughable). So these omissions, whether voluntary or not, make it a good form of mental manipulation.
A film was shot of the modeling done by Dassault, where all the stages of the construction were explained and documented, "the experts" way,
by examining all the very traces left by the construction of the pyramids. And so it has been highlighted the use of a type of elevator to mount the blocks! (with another block on the other side to counterbalance ...) So it reduces the necessary construction time, estimated drastically. For me, this report is tendentious from the beginning, we feel that it seeks to guide us in a specific direction, that of its conclusion.
Concerning the duration, the report condemns itself, since on the one hand it estimates a construction of a duration of 20 years and on the other admits that there is a big floating in the chronology. "The dates of Egyptian history are confirmed only at -680 years before our era" CQFD.
Curiously, the authors give themselves without knowing it, the answer to different enigmas. Especially why the blocks were not perfect parallelepipeds? Because they did not have cement (or not the cement that could hold such loads glued together) so they opted for blocks and a heterogeneous construction see autoblocante, or indeed, it requires a high precision of cutting .
It is clear that we still do not have all the technical answers to date. As to say "impossible" ... since they do not agree on durations up to +/- 200 years ... We can not at the same time contradict or affirm anything, without fall into the general sophistry of the film.
To say that antismicity could not exist at the time because it is a modern science is quite hilarious. There were probably more earthquakes at that time than nowadays. Yes they certainly knew what the effects of an earthquake were. This pseudo-repotage displeased me, because it is a continuation of syllogism in discontinue. I see a great arrogance.
One often even feels that the questions are asked to the speakers, without really being aware of what would give the final plot of the film ... Reason probably for which they did not get a lot of interview of " sizes of the domain.
At every turn of the field it is:
—
IF, if ... but ... then ...
- "
And obviously no Egyptologist wanted to recognize him(19: 52)
It's bad, placed there from this angle.
Of course I think the alignment of the equinoxes was voluntary, otherwise they wouldn't have done it ... And add a layer to the so-called "
rudimentary tools " (Of course they were, but not in number or in ingenuity they showed). So we have on one side: a comment that denies their ability to have access to tools ad hoc, and another open-minded enough to hypothesize * little green men * to believe in a moment of hieroglyphs seeming to show a spaceship ...
Etc ... that it's a tiring how it's brought ... Not until we have to exclude some hypothesis, but it's too much phone.
The commentator's arrogant comment is so unfair that it makes her stupid. As to say that the reproduction of a pyramid identical with the current means would have collapsed! (26: 15)
In short, overall I am disappointed, even if the issues raised are interesting.
Once again, Gégyx does not have the discernment it would take to approach these questions serenely. On my side I never dared post a link to such a turnip. (Not so much its content as the way it is ruined, which drives open doors)
On the other hand, what is extremely regrettable, it is the foul behavior of Gégyx (and subsidiarily Cuicui the hypocrite), which becomes really unbearable in this forum! So much so that his reaction after being extended his hand:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post248405.html#248405
Or it is even referred to this own thread ...
Was able to lock his own yarn there by his attitude of indifference and arrogance! It's a real scandal.
Not content with that, he continues his personal attacks in the philosophy section:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post248416.html#248416
This guy who already had a relatively social behavior, reaches here the stage of nausea.
I think that Cuicui and Gégyx, if they continue to pace themselves, risk being driven to freezing.
