Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

[humus]

Pangolin, the return, the media would have failed? ...sorry

[Christophe]

[Obamot]

The noose is tightening (against all expectations) ...

[Christophe]

It's crazy all these fakenews of eminent scientists that we find on the origins of the covid:

FB_NgpaX0AI8c8o.jpg (231.99 KiB) Viewed 1243 times

[pedrodelavega]

It's crazy all these fakenews of eminent scientists that we find on the origins of the covid:

FB_NgpaX0AI8c8o.jpg

[Obamot]

Végaz, how old are you? Wouldn't you want him to have confirmed it as well?

And already discussed last year, (from the linked post and the previous ones) human-natural-disasters / coronavirus-the-who-or-what-and-why-t16346-760.html? hilit = Honjo # p416119

[ABC2019]

It's crazy all these fakenews of eminent scientists that we find on the origins of the covid:

it's especially crazy the ease with which we circulate non-sourced and unverified information on RS

[Obamot]

It's crazy all these fakenews of eminent scientists that we find on the origins of the covid:

it's especially crazy the ease with which we circulate non-sourced and unverified information on RS

You stoop to a level of phenomenal bullshit, your “On” he is not sourced from TD Luc ...

It's been almost 2 years since when we quote an international scientific authority who contradicts the sulphurous official theses, which are political and not medical, perhaps sourced but not validated and often faked as partial truncated elements, which serve as As an alibi / s for the said policy, as soon as these luminaries are disowned or even dismissed, TO THE POINT THAT A REAL INTERNATIONAL WITCH HUNT IS UNDERWAY.

So you will perceive that the ease with which YOU circulate non-sourced and unpaired nonsense, we don't care.

[Obamot]

This time it is!
It was an accident? ( )

The NIH recognizes [finally] that the US funded the gain of office at the Wuhan lab, despite Fauci's denials.

5170EF7E-15B5-4AC4-AC18-C25BFAB6C178.jpeg (59.72 Kio) Consulté 1033 fois

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nih-ac ... is-denials

E7DC0E66-EFB6-408B-8DF9-C75670583395.jpeg (148.27 KiB) Viewed 1033 times

[This time it's the END of the USA ...!
After the 'Diesel Gate' it will cost them dearly!]

The NIH (National Institutes of Health) today admits to having funded research into gain of function in bats infected with coronaviruses in a laboratory in Wuhan, China, despite repeated denials by Dr.Anthony Fauci that the US taxpayer money was used for this funding.

In a letter to Representative James Comer, a member of the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform, an NIH official admits that a "limited experiment" was conducted to test whether "the proteins of peaks of natural bat coronaviruses circulating in China were able to bind to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.

The letter says laboratory mice infected with modified bat virus "got sicker" than mice that received unmodified bat virus.

BOOK ACCORDING TO: FAUCI RESISTED TRUMP DIRECTIVE TO CANCEL VIRUS RESEARCH GRANT LINKED TO WUHAN'S LABORATORY

The official, Lawrence A. Tabak, accused New York-based non-profit EcoHealth Alliance, which donated funds to the Wuhan lab, of not being transparent about the work being carried out.

Gain-of-function research involves extracting viruses from animals to modify them artificially in the laboratory to make them more transmissible and deadly to humans.

GOP REPRESENTATIVES ASK FOR ANSWERS TO FAUCI TO FIND OUT IF HE MADE AMERICANS ON GAINING RESEARCH IN CHINA

Mr Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly denied that NIH funds were spent on such research in Wuhan, but his organization has awarded millions of dollars in grants to the EcoHealth Alliance, which has spent at least $ 600 on coronavirus research in Wuhan.

Fauci has testified before Congress, repeatedly stating that the NIH does not fund research into office earnings in Wuhan, but Paul insisted that Fauci was lying to Congress and even requested a criminal referral to the Department of Justice.

[AND MANIPULATION MADNESS CONTINUED WITH PSEUDOS-VACCINES]

BOOK ACCORDING TO FAUCI MISTAKE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ON EMPLOYMENT EARNING RESEARCH IN WUHAN

In his questioning of Fauci at a Senate hearing this summer, Sen. Rand Paul cited an article on bat coronavirus research and said that US money has mostly been spent on dangerous and controversial research - a claim that Fauci strongly objected to.

"I have never lied to Congress, and I am not recanting myself," Fauci said when Paul urged him to go back to earlier testimony from the doctor that the United States had not funded research on the gain of office in Wuhan. "You don't know what you're talking about quite frankly, and I want to say it officially."

Paul responded to the news on Twitter saying, "I told you don't even begin to cover the situation here."

[What if we had known that in early 2020 ...?]

A new book by an Australian investigative journalist claims that Fauci allegedly deceived the Trump administration over the search for office in China.

"Fauci's public image as a cautious and attentive medical professional is contradicted by the pivotal role he played in initiating gain-of-office research in the United States after the ban. introduced under the Obama era, as well as by its role in funding research on the coronavirus in China in insecure laboratories. Laboratories that the intelligence services suspect to have triggered the pandemic ", explains Sharri Markson in his new book, "What Really Happened In Wuhan".

In September, leaked documents obtained by private research group DRASTIC "completely contradict" claims made by China and Mr Fauci about the reality of the job gain research being done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. , which may have caused the coronavirus pandemic, according to a former State Department investigator in charge of the COVID-19 investigation.

[Obamot]

(after)

[Where are the idiots who said “complotistes”...?]

On "The Story", host Martha MacCallum said documents released by DRASTIC revealed a plan to create a coronavirus - in this case SARS-CoV-2 - that would be more infectious and transmissible to humans. . The virus would then be released into bat caves where researchers would test the flying mammals with vaccines to see if they can cure the virus.

Fauci's NIAID told Fox News the doctor was "completely sincere."

“Gain of office is a broad term,” the statement said. "Research that requires increased surveillance in the context of HHS P3CO is that which is reasonably expected to create, transfer or use potential pandemic pathogens resulting from improved transmissibility and / or virulence of a pathogen. in humans (ePPP) ". Drs. Collins and Fauci have made it clear in numerous public appearances that the research in question does not meet this definition, and nothing in the latest research progress report changes this fact. "

The statement continues: "To be clear, analysis of published genomic data and grant recipient documents demonstrates that the natural bat coronaviruses studied under the NIH grant to EcoHealth Alliance are genetically very distant from SARS-CoV-2 and could not cause the COVID-19 pandemic. Any statement to the contrary is patently false. These viruses are as genetically different from each other as humans are from cows. "

“The experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance aimed to verify whether peak proteins from bat coronaviruses circulating naturally in China were able to bind to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model. The research aimed to advance our understanding of the interactions of the spike protein with the ACE2 receptor, a component of human biology, in viral infection. It is important to note that the mere presence of the human receptor is not sufficient to cause human infection. All other aspects of the mice, including the immune system, remained unchanged in this model. In this limited experiment, a small number of laboratory mice infected with three experimental bat coronaviruses became sicker than those infected with WIV1, although, as expected, WIV1 also made mice sick. "

“The research plan for the grant was reviewed prior to funding and was found to be scientifically meritorious. It was also determined that the proposed research did not meet the definition of Potential Enhanced Pandemic Pathogens (ePPP) research because the bat coronaviruses used in this research were not shown to infect humans and the experiments were not expected to reasonably increase transmissibility or virulence in humans. Therefore, the research was not submitted to a higher level review as part of the HHS P3CO. Although the results of this limited experiment in mice were somewhat unexpected, NIAID reviewed the activity report and determined that the research described in the report d activity would not have triggered a review under the HHS P3CO Framework because the bat coronaviruses used in this re research infect humans and that the experiments were not reasonably expected to increase transmissibility or virulence in humans. "

Fox News' Marisa Schultz, Charles Creitz and Emma Colton contributed to this report.