Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

[Christophe]

It is indeed a thesis that I defend, the COvid19 is part of a rebalancing process ...order ab chaos.

New-Age theorists predicted at the time that Gaia would react, take revenge on human embezzlement. Ok it was metaphorical and laughable, but still they were right (for the wrong reasons).

Gaia, Gaia ... false if this virus was created by ... man *! As long as we are in the smoking theories ...

* creation not necessarily voluntary ... in all cases we are responsible for the epidemic ... for the reasons already mentioned above ...

[GuyGadebois]

"Creation" is not the right word, I think.

[sen-no-sen]

It is indeed a thesis that I defend, the COvid19 is part of a rebalancing process ...order ab chaos.

New-Age theorists predicted at the time that Gaia would react, take revenge on human embezzlement. Ok it was metaphorical and laughable, but still they were right (for the wrong reasons).

The theory Gaia formulated by James Lovelock is in its naturalist acceptance all that is more serious. Subsequently came grafted on some rather questionable new age theses that discredited this approach, which is a great shame.
The biosphere is a living, self-organized structure, as is the techno-sphere.
In reality the dissipative structures are self-organizing to maximize the dissipation of energy around an equilibrium point (it is a kind of optimization algorithm), when a threshold is exceeded there is rebalancing .

[Christophe]

initiated?
made?
designed?
developed?
product?
generated?

Cross out unnecessary information

[Christophe]

but let's bet that one of the flagship measures will be to come to the rescue of the banks

We can also bet, without great risk, an explosion of bank foreclosures ...

Whether pro (bankruptcy) or private individuals (car credit, real estate ...)

And then you have to save them ...

[sen-no-sen]

There have always been epidemics, but this one validates the fact that we have not progressed much despite all our technologies and that faced with an entity devoid of intelligence * we, we humans are enslaved by events and trap by our contradictions.


* Viruses, however, have an indirect group intelligence.

Christophe you write:

We can also bet, without great risk, an explosion of bank foreclosures ...

Whether pro (bankruptcy) or private individuals (car credit, real estate ...)

And then you have to save them ...

I can't wait for Madame Lagarde to present her press release!

[Ahmed]

The pivotal stage of the Neolithic probably established all the conditions favorable to the spread of epidemics.
The notion of balance remains fundamental and I have seen it in the field of plant pathology: even on a reduced sample (on the scale of France, for example), it is enough that a risk factor is important ( I am referring here to a specific case in which genetic diversity had not been observed) so that, quite quickly, a mutation appears and spreads very quickly.

[GuyGadebois]

initiated?
made?
designed?
developed?
product?
generated?

Cross out unnecessary information

All.

[sicetaitsimple]

And God (x) in all this?
Wouldn't it be him, taken from a desire to piss but subjected to the whims of his prostate, who would not unfortunately have let slip this virus in a moment of inattention a little longer than normally necessary?
I submit this hypothesis to your sagacity.

[izentrop]

Human stupidity, rather worn traditions ...
The virus will at least have the advantage of changing mentalities https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/2726451- ... s-epidemie

Beast pov