The dangers of allopathy vs safety of alternative medicines

[pedrodelavega]

Rebelotte, the big pharma's broken record that turns in a loop. Except that, (but as you know nothing about it you are almost forgivable), the opponents of the H say that beyond the number of Avogadro, there is nothing more, which is a recognition that, below this number, it is not only sugar and therefore until 10 CH, it should work! but let's not be abrupt: can a 2CH work?

No more
"You have a cold, your eyes are weeping and your nose is runny, we are going to give you diluted onion" ....

Nothing that the word "allopathy" does not have any, because invented by the followers of a pseudo-medicine.

you too have the broken record !? Our society generally designates opposing systems: the top, the bottom; hot, cold; the right, the left; the H and therefore the A .; no matter who one day gave these opposition designations.

Samuel Hahnemann invented this opposition, except that there is none: Science recognizes all medicines ... provided they have proven their effectiveness (in the scientific sense I mean).

When to say that it is a pseudo medicine, given the failures of A (146.000 cancer deaths, plus iatrogens: 150.000 consecutive hospitalizations and between 13.000 and 34.000 annual deaths, plus one in 20 cases suffering from nosocomial diseases and its 4.200 annual deaths and all the rest) it is rather she who becomes it!

And how many people saved and / or healed?

[Janic]

you too have the broken record !? Our society generally designates opposing systems: the top, the bottom; hot, cold; the right, the left; the H and therefore the A .; no matter who one day gave these opposition designations.

Samuel Hahnemann invented this opposition, except that there is none: Science recognizes all medicines ... provided they have proven their effectiveness (in the scientific sense I mean).

What a joke! Do you really think that those who distinguished the bottom from the top, the hot from the cold, went through scientific proof of their effectiveness?
And TA science only recognizes itself, it is not difficult to be judge and judge at the same time.

janic wrote: When to say that it is a pseudo medicine, given the failures of A (146.000 cancer deaths, plus iatrogens: 150.000 consecutive hospitalizations and between 13.000 and 34.000 annual deaths, plus one in 20 cases of nosocomial diseases and its 4.200 annual deaths and everything else) rather, it becomes it!

And how many people saved and / or healed.

Neat, not cured!
So simply by comparison with the cancer dead, for that one! One in two deaths and the rest up to 5 years only, not beyond. (Collins curve). Between 5 and 6 years is reached the threshold of irreversibility and all the cancer cells eliminated, it is simply utopian.
http://www.atih.sante.fr/sites/default/ ... s_2015.pdf
therefore the mortality for iatrogens, out of 351.000 hospital deaths, represents 5 to 10% which is enormousplus the nosocomiales!
Servan Schreiber indicates, in one of his books, a friend whose life expectancy determined by the medical profession, would not exceed 18 months, survived 10 years, but from practices outside the system. He himself will last almost 20 years thanks to his anticancer choices, despite having transgressed an important part of his protection program.
Plus, not counted, people healed by unconventional methods and increasing regularly, including H of course!

[Exnihiloest]

...
Neat, not cured!
...

Half of the cancers are cured and all are treated by allopathy.
No cancer is neither cured nor cured by "alternative medicine".

So to take the pretext that all is not cured to oppose allopathy to "alternative medicine" is frankly dishonest.

people healed by unconventional methods and who increase steadily

This is false, except statistics of charlatans, and in no case with regard to cancer.

A concentrate of bad faith and falsification of the facts.

[Janic]

Janic wrote: ...
Neat, not cured!

Half of cancers are cured and all are treated by allopathy

you were also taken up by Ahmed on your optimistic and unrealistic formulation. A cured cancer is a cancer that will not recur until the end of "natural" life. The sites OFFICIALS indicate "healings" at 5 years, no more since most of the time they restart after this period.

No cancer is neither cured nor cured by "alternative medicine".

You don't know that for the simple reason that people "cured" by alternative medicines don't shout it from the rooftops (anyway, the funny ones like you would dispute it) and therefore don't appear in no official document.

So to take the pretext that all is not cured to oppose allopathy to "alternative medicine" is frankly dishonest.

What is dishonest is your mixture of genres and your distortion of the writings so I repeat:
a) Conventional medicine and therefore allopathic, treat and not cure
b) alternative medicines cure but do not cure more
c) any healing depends on the state of the immune system
d) chemicals from big pharma and therefore allopathic, are toxic and therefore dangerous for life and attack and overload the immune system.
e) Alternative medicines respect biological mechanisms and only provide non-toxic help that spares and respects the immune system.

people healed by unconventional methods and who increase steadily

This is false, except statistics of charlatans ,.

There are no statistics official since going through methods unconventional. Only personal testimonies serve as indicators by comparison between before and after any pathology, and that's it that matters for the sick, not abstract and theoretical speeches like you.

and in no case with regard to cancer.

Clear you do not want may this pathology be cured with something other than the chemicals of big pharma! Including at the cost of one death in two!

A concentrate of bad faith and falsification of the facts.

The hospital that laughs at charity! But comparatively it's better than your lies!
Do you consider, to the point of being ridiculed, given your incompetence in this area, the results obtained in India as a falsification of facts?

[pedrodelavega]

a) Conventional medicine and therefore allopathic, treat and not cure
b) alternative medicines treat but don't heal more

Plus, unaccounted for, people healed by unconventional methods and which increase regularly, including H of course!

No cancer is neither cured nor cured by "alternative medicine".

You don't know for the simple reason that people "cured" by alternative medicines do not shout it from the rooftops (anyway the jokes like you would challenge it) and therefore don't appear in no official document.

But then, how you can you know the number and the tendencies of the cures by "alternative medicine"?

people healed by unconventional methods and who increase steadily

[Janic]

janic wrote: a) conventional medicine and therefore allopathic, treats and not healed
b) alternative medicines treat but don't heal anymore
Janic wrote read, not counted, people healed by unconventional methods and which increase regularly, whose the H obviously

!

Janic wrote:

No cancer is neither cured nor cured by "alternative medicine".

You don't know for the simple reason that people "healed" by alternative medicines do not shout it from the rooftops (anyway the jokes like you would dispute it) and therefore do not appear in any official document.

Good observation! At the first, the quotation marks effectively underline the relative aspect of this word in its context.

But then, how you can you know the number and the tendencies of the cures by "alternative medicine"?

This is the kind of question you should have asked a long time ago!
There is a population parallel to official medicine with its testimonies indicating the state of deterioration of health, despite conventional treatments and the improvement of this by these alternative medicines. but as it is a world that you do not meet and that you prefer to ignore as it is your right.

janic wrote: people healed by unconventional methods and who regularly increase

these unconventional methods cover multiple sectors and methods, not navel-like like the A who thinks she is the only one, the only way out of which there is no salvation (taking up the dogma of the Catholic Church with its: " Out of the church point of salvation ", We don't make dogs with cats)

[pedrodelavega]

You don't know for the simple reason that people "cured" by alternative medicine don't shout it from the rooftops (anyway the jokes like you would dispute it) and therefore do not appear in any official document.

But then, how you can you know the number and the tendencies of the cures by "alternative medicine"?

This is the kind of question you should have asked a long time ago! There is a population parallel to official medicine with his testimonies indicating the state of deterioration of health, despite conventional treatments and the improvement of this by these alternative medicines. but as it is a world that you do not meet and that you prefer to ignore as it is your right.

they say it but they don't say it ......
It doesn't heal but it heals .....


"parallel population", ie? a sect?

[Janic]

they say it but they don't say it ......
It doesn't heal but it heals .....

Do you understand this difficult at this point?
They say it to each other, but do not say it to the official system. Bis repetita !!!!!!
No it doesn't cure, it heals like any therapy, healing is intrinsic except that chemical poisons, recognized as toxic by big pharma, thwart this healing as reported by the dosages on drugs and their side effects summarized, but developed on Vidal (and still the labs do not say everything!)

[Exnihiloest]

they say it but they don't say it ......
It doesn't heal but it heals .....

Do you understand this difficult at this point?
They say it to each other, but do not say it to the official system. Bis repetita !!!!!!

Anything ... Free affirmation, as usual.

[Janic]

Anything ... Free affirmation, as usual.

free affirmation, as usual! What can you know about what you deny exist by principle? You have neither experience nor lived in this field, but you dogmatize on your only ignorance and you therefore say anything ... as usual!