Health, new about AIDS?

[Obamot]

Euuuuh yes!

You do well to add that ... A bone marrow transplant is not advisable, it is better to act BEFORE!

The case cited is extreme in so-called “firefighter” medicine. That is, if they don't turn off "The fire of leukemia", the patient will leave their skin there!

What is - indeed - important in this information, is therefore not the transplant but the conclusions that can be drawn from this news:

- AIDS can be cured, depending on the circumstances of the field, and that if it is changed, the disease no longer appears (ie "magic" disappearance of the alleged traceability protein of Dr. Montagnier, present but hypothesis invented from scratch and without scientific basis, this is now certain).
- AIDS is therefore not a fatality that could befall everyone.

It's clear Dr! You have to make it much simpler, as you suggest ...

[nlc]

To be precise and clear:

It is not for me!

because we kill the marrow by irradiation before grafting the new marrow of the chosen donor spontaneously resistant to AIDS (1% of the population !!

What does it mean in concrete terms to be spontaneously resistant to AIDS !?

So "the field" became that of the AIDS resistant donor who killed the virus which remained hidden !!!

Virus which has never been proven to be responsible for anything, it must be remembered all the same. It is also so well hidden that it is not found in patients, there are only "anti-bodies".

[Obamot]

... and a virus which is not even one, since it is classified in the category - recognized as harmless - of retroviruses. (It didn't take long before NLC reacted )

[nlc]

Right, retroviruses don't kill the cells they invest.

[Obamot]

Yes, and there where Dedelco's reasoning can only be shared. You shouldn't treat, but you have to treat your body before you need to treat ....

Besides, it all gives the feeling that at the Institut Pasteur, they classified it in retroviruses, because at the time it was a sector that was very little addressed, that it touched on faith in genetics and to oncogenesis (cancer), and that in this way speaking of enzymes (and consequently of proteins) it was neither seen nor known I confuse you: the goal being to make fear (... but as if by chance the track of the influence of lifestyle, is right in this target ...)

[nlc]

Yes, and I re-specify that "resistant to AIDS" does not mean anything, since AIDS is not a disease, but a lack of immune defense. So being resistant to the absence of immune defenses doesn't mean much

There are confusions, shortcuts and misconceptions very entrenched in people, because relayed again and again by the media who do not think (but hey this is not new).

[Christophe]

Question: are the 50 French people living with HIV who do not know it (see the current advertising campaign) all or have they been under / malnourished or drugged?

[Obamot]

Yes or "Borderline".

This is easily explained, if only by the fact that the precursors of an "acid" food bowl are very numerous, while the "bases" must be sought by choosing your foods carefully, as well as cooking method which plays a considerable role because of the transformation of fats into "trans" formula (preferably steam cooking at ambient pressure)

But there are other avenues for the “entry” of pollutants into the body, which will add to the deficiencies of a general condition already well underway.

Like the skin (1.5 m2 is gigantic compared to the surface of the buccal mucosa ...)

[nlc]

Question: are the 50 French people living with HIV who do not know it (see the current advertising campaign) all or have they been under / malnourished or drugged?

But we don't care because they are in good health and will remain so as long as we don't tell them anything and we don't treat them !!

And what I would like someone to explain to me is that if these 50000 French people do not know that they are HIV positive, how can the advertising spot know that there are 50000 !? It is so ridiculous these figures which come out of nowhere .....


Edit: And you still confuse seropositive = AIDS = sick, then nothing proves the link on the one hand, especially since seropositive means that we find in these people antibodies...

[nlc]

Question: are the 50 French people living with HIV who do not know it (see the current advertising campaign) all or have they been under / malnourished or drugged?

And in addition: no relationship between being malnourished and being HIV positive !!
For example I will not become HIV positive if I am malnourished! By cons have AIDS why not, since by eating poorly my defenses will necessarily collapse