by Janic » 08/05/15, 09:18
sen no sen hello
Sorry but I can't let you say that, in some countries access to care, and not just financial aid for care, is almost non-existent.
We must not confuse the shortcomings of economism, the areas it contaminates.
Indeed, the economy has a perverse role. However, we must not confuse certain populations who for millennia has supported his health needs by his own natural approaches (with his own mistakes or abuse) and the current state where the nice white comes with his "miraculous" medicine that heals everything. In fact, as one interviewee said: " Western medicine is very effective in the short term but does not last (or the pathology hidden by these drugs quickly reappears) "and therefore she used ancestral herbal medicines, manipulations to permanently eliminate her" health "problems.
but please spare me the speech of the westerner who criticizes everything goes medicine but who has 3 pharmacies and 1 doctor within a radius of 5km ...
The westerner that I am has for decades modified his approach to the disease with better hygiene and since pharmacies only serve me to buy albuplasm, strips, even talcum powder and other similar items .
When the doctor I only use it for a sports certificate. But I am well aware of being the exception (of being part of a minority) in a society which has become enslaved, dependent, on big pharma drugs, even if gradually a part of the population backtracks and returns to gentle, inexpensive and non-aggressive therapies like when I was a small child where the cash cow that is the SS did not spit in the pelvis for problems easily resolved using a few compresses, suction cups, wraps, etc. .
Quote:
This is an unfounded argument. In fact, historically, it is the development of general hygiene conditions that has led to lower mortality among fragile populations such as children and the elderly. Otherwise, if the dying houses for old people are called increasing life expectancy… .. !!!!
Medicine alone does not explain the increase in life expectancy, which is why I noted among other parameters.
Only these parameters are for the majority of cases the main actors. Furthermore, the impression of the increase in lifespan is distorted by the period in which these “centenarians” or in progress were born, that is to say the beginning of the 20th century until the middle of it. where the living conditions were harsher and where the most fragile were eliminated naturally by mother nature and only survived the most robust. But "thanks" to the most fragile current methods survive and transmit a reduced capital to the following generations which will be made even more fragile by the system. (it's anti Darwinic!)
At one time, in cases where it was performed, the caesarean section was often fatal to the mother and / or the child.
It is no longer big pharma but surgery. But there as well of the children were badly placed in the belly of the mother and some manipulations allowed in a major part of the cases (one returns there) that the child is presented well.
Medicine is not only fighting infections, it also helps repair the body. How many people suffer from heart attack, complicated fractures, stings, burns etc?
You mix, voluntarily or not, big pharma and medicine, which did not wait for synthetic chemistry. Both methods of care and prevention have existed for millennia; it is the loss of this knowledge that has become dramatic since a mother whose child is going to be skinned, will rush to the emergency room to be applied antiseptics, antibiotics, a vaccine against tetanus and other nonsense then that a little water, a drop of lemon and a dry protective dressing would have worked.
For heart attacks, for a long time it was believed that it was inevitable, a divine punishment! Today we know the role of food hygiene, the lack of sufficient physical expenditure, plus the multitude of endocrine disruptors or not accompanied by the stress of western life in large cities.
Fortunately the tide is turning and more and more these protective or reducing factors of pathology are disseminated by the media: it remains to be heard, understood and put into practice !
For fractures, it's surgery, not big pharma.
For the bites, light burns, it is the same thing that emerges from the role of the parents, it is still necessary that they are informed, have practice.
Rest, and there we can meet, the extreme cases (which I mentioned earlier), where the balance sheet advantages / disadvantages can be done to the advantage of big pharma with powerful, effective products (like drugs ) but dangerous.
Quote:
Most of the sick have to take drugs until the end of their life.
What diseases?
Just about all of our so-called modern society! Take a look at pharmacies and find out who the biggest consumers of meds are, for anything and everything. Also go to the dying rooms for old people with the little blue, red and green pills (a festival of appetizing colors) which alone would almost suffice to feed their consumers
Would his patients have survived without his treatments?
Indeed the term survived is well suited! But to survive is to live? While a better lifestyle could have avoided all this medicated waste. Did you know that the anti-conceptual pill increases the cardiovascular risks by 400% (which will be declared pathologically many years later when the age advances) and by 2000% if the woman smokes and in addition is considered as an aggravating carcinogenic factor ? Or that the modern flour has depleted the future bread and becomes an important factor in cardiovascular disease and this has lasted for decades without the problem being exposed to the general public consuming the pretty French baguette, etc ...
So, of course, we can neglect all this during his youthful years by "enjoying" life, but which will have to be paid for years later, which "will justify" the intervention of big pharma and its poisons ... which will allow them to survive ... indeed!
Quote:
Indeed, but the chemical should only intervene in extreme cases which cannot be resolved otherwise; which would drastically reduce the use of these chemical drugs ... but it is not for tomorrow, nor for tomorrow!
We agree, but this is a problem linked to economism, as seen above, we must not confuse everything.
No ! It is above all a question of education and information. As long as big pharma will hold the reins of the disease through its imposed products, ARE economy will benefit greatly. The use of "simple" is also of an economic nature like the rest, but requires a personal implication, rather than to discharge (of its responsibilities of educator and protector of the life of its close relations and by repercussion of that of the generations to come), on a trained doctor in universities subsidized by big pharma which expects a juicy economic return.
Quote:
Excellent work which underlines, if necessary, that the disease is global, both physical and mental which should make us think about the consequences of our poor choices in all areas of life.
This was to open up a new, more holistic and social cybernetic domain.
Indeed, but for all that one should not dream, it takes between 2 and 4 generations for significant and visible changes to appear in a society. The so-called soft methods are developing rapidly in certain “intellectual” circles (I mean that makes you think and change, which has nothing to do with any IQ), but moreover come up against a conservatism based on habits ( recent), confidence in the system (no other choice for that matter) and especially the fear of the unknown, plus the speeches distilled by big pharma by medics. (re HIV and re Vaccines)
0 x
