The links between antivax, anti abortion, anti science...

[sicetaitsimple]

If it could set precedent, it would be a real victory, not for antivax, but simply for European vaccine legislation.

Beyond the fact that this is a very partial reading of this resolution 2361, it should be remembered that a "resolution" is an opinion, but in no way binding legislation.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

If it could set precedent, it would be a real victory, not for antivax, but simply for European vaccine legislation.

Beyond the fact that this is a very partial reading of this resolution 2361, it should be remembered that a "resolution" is an opinion, but in no way binding legislation.

Granted, but that does not erase the hypocrisy of the national powers, nor their inability to respond to the spirit of these opinions, all that is needed to mark the brains to such an extent that "camps" have been created and that each "camp" has hardened to the point of caricature and caused the turmoil we know. Whether it's the inoculation "in complete confidence" of an experimental product not without side effects, or the physical constraints of confinement, the disastrous effect of curfews, the blackmail of "vaccination" with the end of the " health pass" which offers you basic rights denied to others, the effect on young people is guaranteed! The fragile and the old had only to wait with their paracetamol friend for their condition to deteriorate to saturate the specialized rooms already saturated before the covid, the others survived with often consequences, the "vaccine" arrived, the virus had mutated, nothing protected against transmission, children and pregnant women were bitten when no study had been carried out. In short, a total success in a climate of both trust and disproportionate mistrust.

[Obamot]

Oh how bô he is bô the lured bô (disavowed.)

[izentrop]

"camps" have been created and that each "camp" has hardened

On the one hand, those who respect established science, democracy...
On the other, the "go to war", the "must not touch my sacred freedom"...

inoculation "with confidence" of an experimental product not without side effects

knots of misinformation, conveyed even by wrongly renowned "great" professors, who often unblock at the end of their career, blinded by their melon for some and or by more or less wacky ideologies...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The side effects are described by the manufacturers themselves, the ceusses who are affected, the doctors who note them and the scientific studies which go in this direction. Once again you're in your fiction, Izy.

[izentrop]

you're in your fiction, Izy.

Ask yourself the opposite question https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ... res-84625/

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Ask yourself the question of whether the words of a journalist are science... you who feast on this word and rely on it constantly.

[izentrop]

Ask yourself the question of whether the words of a journalist are science... you who feast on this word and rely on it constantly.

She cites facts that you can verify for yourself, but it's too difficult for you to admit, probably because of your scientistic religion...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Precisely, the facts are contradictory with his allegations. Affected families, doctors, hospital staff and scientists worthy of the name have seen it for years. You've always had a problem with reality.

[izentrop]

It is a question of scientific reality from which you only get it for
Moreover, in science, it is not the one who speaks the loudest who is right, we have seen it again with Raoult who sinks with each of his interventions.