Application of the Health Pass. For who ? How? 'Or' What ? Efficiency? Limits ? Legality?

[Janic]

absolutely! I'm the boss, ignorant in chief, who is totally incompetent in medicine and especially in health, who played the game of "experts" in direct or indirect conflict of interest with the labs, only of the mRNA type, thus expressing their belief in the miracle of a pseudo medicine and thus totally denying any effectiveness to other means, including the usual vaccine methods, available.
And the zozos have been ridiculed by the forced populations, by taking absurd measures, contrary to the "protocol" logic imposed until then.
In reality, the provaxx, by obligation, only express the resentment which turns against their own situation, (of sheep devoured by the wolf) and which jealous those who have chosen not to be guinea pigs, constrained and forced by the fear of the policeman.
It gives izmentrop vaccinated by bleating with happiness and trying at all costs to justify themselves for having made a big mistake and which turns desperately against those who have not made a fool of themselves. The HAS, which has now reversed its jacket, (since the populations refuse reminders, the wearing of masks and the alcoholization of their hands) will be considered, by him and his ilk, as conspirators who dissociate themselves from BP.

[Remundo]

Sometimes I wonder if Izy has other convictions than the macronist mainstream.

here we agree with Izy on the water basins, but probably not by the same approach.

So Izy, on the subject of the health pass, are you bringing us covidists who invoke "ethics" to prohibit unvaccinated caregivers from exercising?

Damn that's tightrope walking...

Because it is to lack ethics 3 times:
1) the first not to have respected the freedom of vaccination for their colleagues,
2) the second of banishing them from the medical system without valid and serious reason,
3) the third to prevent their return while the Hospital and its patients... are dying!

[izentrop]

It's because "serious good cause" you don't want to hear and yet it's scientifically proven.

[Janic]

Because it is to lack ethics 3 times:
1) the first not to have respected the freedom of vaccination for their colleagues,
2) the second of banishing them from the medical system without valid and serious reason,[*]
3) the third to prevent their return while the Hospital and its patients... are dying!

he doesn't give a damn, too anxious to justify himself on the macronist positions he has followed and, like his boss at heart, he cannot go back without backtracking and therefore making himself even more ridiculous than at present.

[*] particularly by accepting caregivers sick with covid AND vaccinated, rather than healthy no vaxx already immunized against the real virus and therefore not contaminating! And people put themselves in the hands of a weak decision-making system like this

izentrop » 01/04/23, 08:1o

It's because "serious good cause" you don't want to hear and yet it's scientifically proven.

scientifically unproven your serious valid reason since the HAS has changed its position.

[Janic]

That's it! We now know why the izmenteur believes in the magic virtues of big pharma and its poisons!
science-and-technology/artificial-intelligence-t15612-140.html#p529244
However, let's remember, izy ChatGPT is a storytelling AI, not an encyclopedic AI.

[Remundo]

covid ticks...

[Obamot]

It's because "serious good cause" you don't want to hear and yet it's scientifically proven.

You mean by pseudo-scientists who got bought off, based on your daily stainless steel debunked daily for years?

But now we can't take it anymore... You're really burnt out, man

Especially since we saw what you were worth in your posts recently...
—> standpoint: climato-skepticism!
-> you continue his anxiety intox
-> you force-feed us and dare to pretend that you have force-fed
-> pretend you don't understand corruption

Frankly, except for the electronics, so bad that in your place I wouldn't even dare to come back here.

[Janic]

I wouldn't even dare come back here.

and then you would leave him with no income like the bosses pissed off. That would be cruel!

[izentrop]

Sometimes in the bullseye, the duck...

[Janic]

and once again, the service ignoramus did not understand the humor of the duck