izentrop wrote:Pessimistic scientists believe that we cannot predict and that we must remain on the alert. The most optimistic say that it's been 10 years since the coronavirus was discovered and that no cases in humans have been detected. All this while the Covid crisis is not over; Everything in its time.
Obamot wrote:"nice" strike Guy, congratulations...
“the friend” Obamot wrote:Oh well when you find "the reason", nod...
(and it's your right as much as I don't care, simple observation) GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
1: I "like" as I hear it and for once Zombizy is not talking bullshit (in my eyes), I don't see why I should be accountable to anyone or should I do anything either to one or more people on this forum. I told you that I don't care, it doesn't change the anteriority of your cognitive "slip"... dazzling
2: Who says there is no research and manipulation regarding gains of office in Wuhan or elsewhere? Not me. On the contrary. it has nothing to do, it's YOU who blames me and not the other way around it doesn't change anything about the anteriority of your cognitive "slip"... (to be nice...)
3: Who claims that HIV sequences are found in the covid virus (in which one, by the way, given all the variants?) Not me, since it is false (retracted study). ah, but it's ME who told you “that”... you're taking up my argument there... (except that Montagnier hasn't changed his position, and if I refer to him, we can't can hardly consider it a fault let alone a “betrayal of trust”), and again, it does not change the anteriority of your cognitive “slip”...
3: Who is claiming that this virus was deliberately or accidentally released into the wild? Not me, there is no certainty of any kind regarding this hypothesis. first I was careful, it's a hypothesis that can not be ruled out, in law a bundle of clues is proof (and there it is significant) then there are exculpations "a contrario" (and there's none, no missing link despite all the research for 1 year in all the sequencing banks using software, nothing, nada, zero,) which would validate the opposite according to the scientists who talk about it , the “de facto” validation of the leak from the lab (deliberate or not, that is another question) is aggravated by the fact that “as if by chance”, is added the “gain of function” whose deliberate purpose is to infect man! And this would end up (in your opinion?) precisely in this "natural" virus found who knows where (I mean without any tangible and proven ecosystem that would have been favorable in the eventual transmission to humans, or whatever it was someone else who would preside or would not validate the need for it a priori!?) Point that you therefore contest, but without to this day you have NEVER brought the slightest convincing technical or scientific element which would justify or demonstrate that this virus would be 100% natural (currently the trend is rather towards the opposite since the NIH has confessed to funding “gains of function” and that Sen. Rand Paul seems sure of the elements on which it is based!* Here again, we can hardly consider that as a fault and even less a "betrayal of trust", and again, it does not change the anteriority of your cognitive "slip"... In the end and as it was necessary to wait for it, there are only slight discrepancies which absolutely do not justifynot this shift, already because it predates the alleged facts...
*) and it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact “let it be known that countries that have P4 are experimenting with viruses everywhere”, this does not validate OR rather does not “automatically” invalidate a more or less well-founded opinion, unless you are in the syllogism (to be nice).
It will therefore again be necessary for you, to find a posteriori "the supposed life that would go with the alleged facts"
Good luck in your quest for nothingness!
Thank you and goodbye.
https://www.rtl.fr/actu/international/c ... 7900119639The Hong Kong authorities have taken the decision to slaughter hundreds of hamsters as well as thousands of other small mammals (chinchillas, rabbits, guinea pigs) as a "precautionary measure". 11 rodents have reportedly tested positive for Covid-19, along with two people from the Little Boss pet store in the commercial district of Causeway Bay. In all, nearly 2.000 mammals have been or will be exterminated as soon as possible.
RTL wrote:The Hong Kong authorities have taken the decision to slaughter hundreds of hamsters as well as thousands of other small mammals (chinchillas, rabbits, guinea pigs) as a "precautionary measure". 11 rodents have reportedly tested positive for Covid-19, along with two people from the Little Boss pet store in the commercial district of Causeway Bay. In all, nearly 2.000 mammals have been or will be exterminated as soon as possible.
izentrop wrote:Poor beastshttps://www.rtl.fr/actu/international/c ... 7900119639The Hong Kong authorities have taken the decision to slaughter hundreds of hamsters as well as thousands of other small mammals (chinchillas, rabbits, guinea pigs) as a "precautionary measure". 11 rodents have reportedly tested positive for Covid-19, along with two people from the Little Boss pet store in the commercial district of Causeway Bay. In all, nearly 2.000 mammals have been or will be exterminated as soon as possible.
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 194 guests
