no need, tobacco was most often used during religious ceremonies and not in daily consumption. For cancer, there was no question like today, even when cancers were extremely rare. The health of Native Americans deteriorated when the invaders brought their illnesses and their alcohol!but of course, the Amerindians knew that tobacco caused cancer, it is well known !!!janic wrote: Especially the increase in the price of the package!
Except that the effects of tobacco have been known, like alcohol, for centuries and statistical studies have only confirmed the evidence already observed.
especially starting with you!could you stop telling absolutely anything, to change?
I take your stupid examples, for what they are worth, that is to say again obvious that have not been seen only recently!
but of course that if, since there was no increase before these last decades when people were not exposed to the Sun,
which represent only a minority compared to all outside trades which have hundreds of thousands of professionals who are not affected
by observation! without it, no correlation possible with or without study and this is what has been done for millennia. TES studies have THAT a few decades of existence, roughly speaking for 2 centurieshow do you want to correlate without studying?
You don't even know what the meaning of this designation is. No one day, no one always! Doctors for millennia and in all parts of the world have not waited after TES studies to act.do you think it was Archangel Gabriel who came to tell the doctors?
And you without knowing!you're just rolling out a series of absurd statements without any justification ...
Of course this can be promoted by EXCESSIVE AND BRUTAL exposure to the sun.
No need, observation is enough first, your statistical studies (which I do not deny useful in certain circumstances [*]) only interveneAPRES that the populations observed it first as all civilizations have done since their origins."of course " !! but how do you know it apart from having read it, and how do you think we came to know it, apart from doing statistical studies?
Yes, they used the tam tam or word of mouth and it will be very useful when this current means will be turned against the same humanity that invented it (genre IA)soon you will tell me that the computer you are typing on has been known for a long time and that modern science has only confirmed its existence, pff ....
For the rest, computers only copy the biological mechanisms that did not wait after it to exist either. Therefore which technology with obvious limits (for now)
[*] for example at the level of vaccines, We could not demonstrate that they were useless, if, the official statistical annals had not demonstrated it. And yet, despite this, the myth shown to be false by these same statistics continues to persist. Like what, everyone uses it according to what they want to demonstrate!
